Beaufighter vs. Ki-45

Discussions on History. Please keep on topic & friendly. Provocative & one sided political posts will be deleted.

Re: Beaufighter vs. Ki-45

Postby ATI_7500 » Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:34 am

There were some german night fighter pilots with eighty victories and more. But not all of them flew the Me-110. Later they also flew He-219s and Ju-88s. Both of them were much better aircraft than the Me, since the He-219 was planned as a nightfighter from the beginning on and the Ju-88 had superior performance to the Messerschmitt.  
ATI_7500
 

Re: Beaufighter vs. Ki-45

Postby Hagar » Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:49 am

I suspect it's more down to the situation & type of enemy aircraft. Nightfighters work best in a defensive situation when they're over home territory & directed by a reliable control sytem with experienced operators. Put any Luftwaffe nightfighter in amongst an RAF bomber stream anywhere over Western Europe & he could take his pick until his ammo ran out. Many bombers were shot down without ever seeing the aircraft that attacked them. Some of the more experienced nightfighter pilots would lurk around the circuit of the bomber bases & pick them off just when they thought they'd made it home safely.

I don't think the RAF had the same success rate mainly because the AI radar equipment wasn't available during the London Blitz. Ordinary day fighters like the Hurricane & Spitfire were used as nightfighters & after being directed onto the target the pilots had to rely on their eyesight. When they eventually got the equipment & specialised aircraft the Luftwaffe night attacks were often hit & run raids by individual aircraft & never in the concentrated numbers they had been in 1940/41.
Last edited by Hagar on Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30862
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Beaufighter vs. Ki-45

Postby Felix/FFDS » Mon Mar 28, 2005 11:12 am

[quote]There were some german night fighter pilots with eighty victories and more. But not all of them flew the Me-110. Later they also flew He-219s and Ju-88s. Both of them were much better aircraft than the Me, since the He-219 was planned as a nightfighter from the beginning on and the Ju-88 had superior performance to the Messerschmitt.
Felix/FFDS
User avatar
Felix/FFDS
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16776435
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 9:42 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Beaufighter vs. Ki-45

Postby Jester » Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:05 pm

I am wondering about both which aircraft, and the pilot. Forgive me for not being specific.

In the case of the Me110 (or any aircraft with multiple gun stations), who would get credit for a victory if the tail gunner shoots down a plane: the tail gunner, the pilot, or the aircraft? Sorry, I am completely uneducated about this.

John
Vision: The ability to look beyond what you can see
Jester
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 12:52 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Beaufighter vs. Ki-45

Postby Hagar » Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:15 pm

I'm no authority on nightfighters but I suspect that on 2-seat aircraft like the Bf 110 the pilot did the shooting. The other crew member would operate the AI radar to guide him on to the target.

According to this, Major Heinz Schnaufer, with 121 victories, was the top-scoring night fighter ace of all time
http://www.aviationarthangar.com/tnifibfzeava.html
Throughout his career Schnaufer only flew the Bf110 operationally, despite subsequently commanding a Geschwader equipped with the JU 88.


PS. Sorry, apparently the Bf 110 nightfighter could carry 3 crew. The gunner was optional & I suspect the rearward firing gun, either single or double-barreled according to type, was mainly defensive.
Last edited by Hagar on Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30862
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Beaufighter vs. Ki-45

Postby ATI_7500 » Wed Mar 30, 2005 5:08 am

PS. Sorry, apparently the Bf 110 nightfighter could carry 3 crew. The gunner was optional & I suspect the rearward firing gun, either single or double-barreled according to type, was mainly defensive.


I second that. The  gunner mostly had two 7.92mm MGs avaiable.
ATI_7500
 

Re: Beaufighter vs. Ki-45

Postby HH » Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:31 am

Unless the 110 was being flown backwards, the rear gunstation was certainly defensive -- except to whoever was attacking from behind: to him, it was very offensive.
Sorry, sometimes just can't stop these kind of thoughts.
HH
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:16 am

Re: Beaufighter vs. Ki-45

Postby denishc » Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:10 am

Unless the 110 was being flown backwards, the rear gunstation was certainly defensive -- except to whoever was attacking from behind: to him, it was very offensive.
Sorry, sometimes just can't stop these kind of thoughts.


 This brings up an interesting question, should a defensive gunner down an attacking aircraft does he get credit for the kill?  Or does it go to the pilot?  (In some cases the pilot would maneuver the aircraft to give the rear gunner a better shot at the attacker.)  I'm sure the kill is marked to the aircraft but who gets the credit and have there been any defensive gunner "aces"?
denishc
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 5:01 pm

Re: Beaufighter vs. Ki-45

Postby ATI_7500 » Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:35 am

Well, I think all kills were "shared" between the gunner and the pilot, so if the pilot was an ace, the gunner was one,too.
ATI_7500
 

Previous

Return to History

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 279 guests