Formation flying

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Formation flying

Postby expat » Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:36 am

How would you like to see several 747's of a handful of A380's is a nice formation...............flying over the Atlantic :o

To Increase Passenger Jet Fuel Efficiency, Airlines Look to Nature's Flying Formations

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: Formation flying

Postby JakesF14 » Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:51 am

that would be an interresting change in general aviation. But bad weather ect will make it difficult. Thus formation flying will only be possible in ideal conditions.?
Could work, I think!

[edit]
or maybe not....on second thought[/edit]
Last edited by JakesF14 on Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
JakesF14
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1866
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 5:42 am
Location: South Africa

Re: Formation flying

Postby patchz » Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:43 am

[color=#000000]I really don't think this is a new concept. NASCAR calls it 'drafting'.
Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Re: Formation flying

Postby C » Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:25 pm

They seem to have forgotten a little bit of the basics; or, more likely, they've never flown formation in a airliner (or anything perhaps?).

Flying in formation = lots of throttle movements = increased fuel burn. :)

Typical pointless academic study.
Last edited by C on Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Formation flying

Postby Isak922 » Thu Dec 10, 2009 2:00 pm

They seem to have forgotten a little bit of the basics; or, more likely, they've never flown formation in a airliner (or anything perhaps?).

Flying in formation = lots of throttle movements = increased fuel burn. :)

Typical pointless academic study.


Then again, it doesn't have to be a Blue Angel or Thunderbird type formation. It actually says that it can be a very loose one... A couple miles of distance between the aircraft.

Besides, the autopilot can handle all of the throttle inputs :P

What they're saying in this article, is that as long as the aircraft stays within a certain area within range of another aircraft, the benefits will still be applicable. Maybe to a slightly lesser degree than if they were a hundred or so feet apart, but still there.
4GB DDR2 PC5300; 3.2GHz Pentium D 940, Nvidia 9800GT 1024MB DDR3, Windows XP Pro SP3
User avatar
Isak922
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1484
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:09 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: Formation flying

Postby Hagar » Thu Dec 10, 2009 2:07 pm

Can you really imagine any airlines doing this? As Charlie says, it's a typical pointless academic study.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Formation flying

Postby C » Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:23 pm

Besides, the autopilot can handle all of the throttle inputs :P

What they're saying in this article, is that as long as the aircraft stays within a certain area within range of another aircraft, the benefits will still be applicable. Maybe to a slightly lesser degree than if they were a hundred or so feet apart, but still there.


Doesn't matter who's controlling the throttles, the basic mechanics are still the same, and even with a "cleverer" computer, you'll still have more variation in engine power settings, and hence probably lose any potential benefits.

Then the matter of traffic control, or lack of it, over the Oceans, has the be thought of. With aircraft crossing in 60 mile wide lanes, avoiding weather or dealing with in flight emergencies would be a nightmare. Mind you, for navigation equipment failures you'd be allright! :)
Last edited by C on Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth


Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 394 guests