Page 1 of 1

Rough Landing

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:09 am
by Papa9571
It appears Qantas's reputation for never having to write of an aircraft due to an accident is in jeopardy.  At least no one was hurt.

http://www.news.com.au/travel/story/0,2 ... 90,00.html

Re: Rough Landing

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 7:53 am
by Papa9571
The aircraft had been inspected and will be repaired at a cost of clode to $100 million to keep Qantas's reputation intact.

Link to the story to follow

Re: Rough Landing

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:04 am
by expat
BPB, however, why should Qantas have to worry. I was not one of their aircraft. It was a wet-lease, just their colours on the aircraft.

Matt

Re: Rough Landing

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:07 am
by Xyn_Air
BPB, however, why should Qantas have to worry. I was not one of their aircraft. It was a wet-lease, just their colours on the aircraft.

Matt


Pride - one of the human prime motivators.  Not saying this is necessarily bad, mind you.  I would feel rather confident flying with an air carrier that was so maniacal about their safety record.

;D ;)

Darrin

Re: Rough Landing

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:12 am
by expat
BPB, however, why should Qantas have to worry. I was not one of their aircraft. It was a wet-lease, just their colours on the aircraft.

Matt


Pride - one of the human prime motivators.  Not saying this is necessarily bad, mind you.  I would feel rather confident flying with an air carrier that was so maniacal about their safety record.

;D ;)

Darrin



Safety record, or public image. The record is, a crashed repair ;D

Matt