RC fighter (UK)

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

RC fighter (UK)

Postby ozzy72 » Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:32 pm

The defence technology spin-out company Qinetiq has successfully completed the world's first flight of a plane remotely controlled by a fighter aircraft.
The trial flight, carried out at Boscombe Down airfield in Wiltshire, is part of a programme to develop a system that would enable a single pilot to control a number of unmanned aircraft by remote control.
The US Air Force routinely uses unpiloted aircraft for search and destroy missions. These planes are controlled remotely from a missions operations centre.
The advantage is that these planes can be sent into dangerous areas without risking a pilot's life. The supposed downside is that the controllers are remote from the battle area and so may not be able to respond to rapidly changing situations.
That is why the RAF is testing a converted Tornado whose pilot is able to control four unmanned craft from the cockpit.
In the system's first big test the Tornado pilot flew a passenger jet - a BAC-111 - and three computer-simulated craft while airborne.
In the exercise, Squadron Leader Andy Blythe successfully used his unmanned aircraft to search out an enemy target and destroy it.
According to Squadron Leader Richard Wells, a member of the RAF's Future Combat Air Capability team: "Militarily speaking not only does it allow the pilot to remain in a safe area - but it allows him to operate his team of unmanned aircraft and allow him to carry out the elements of the mission he wants to undertake."
But some independent commentators, such as Rohit Jaggi, aviation columnist for the Financial Times, believe that in the heat of battle pilots would be swamped with information and unable to engage in combat and control their robot planes.
"The main risk is to the pilot being overwhelmed," he said. "They won't be able to deal with threats to the unmanned aircraft - so you may as well control them from sunny Wiltshire."
Mr Jaggi believes it may well be easier to control unmanned aircraft from the ground - where there is less stress and more battlefield information.
Image
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
User avatar
ozzy72
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 33284
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:45 am
Location: Madsville

Re: RC fighter (UK)

Postby Craig. » Mon Apr 02, 2007 3:38 pm

While I know this is the next step in warfare, I also think this will mean far more downed aircraft simply because a pilot no longer has to worry about his own life in the event of problems.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: RC fighter (UK)

Postby Mictheslik » Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:00 pm

Saw this on the news this morning.....wouldnt have liked to be on the BAC 111..."look no hands" :D

.mic
[center]Image
User avatar
Mictheslik
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5517
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:32 am
Location: Bristol, England

Re: RC fighter (UK)

Postby dcunning30 » Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:01 pm

Impressive.  My first thought is about the potential for multitasking overload on one pilot, but I suppose they have that worked out.
TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
User avatar
dcunning30
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:34 pm
Location: The Land of Nod

Re: RC fighter (UK)

Postby expat » Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:16 pm

The defence technology spin-out company Qinetiq has successfully completed the world's first flight of a plane remotely controlled by a fighter aircraft.



I thought that the Luftwaffe towards the end of WWII already managed this and then put a warhead in the nose and used it with limited success in the anti shipping role, or is the clue in the question with the words "controlled by a fighter aircraft"?

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....


Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 660 guests