Page 1 of 1
lowest approach ever
Posted:
Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:35 pmby Canuck.
i dont know where i should post this
this is the lowest approach ive ever seen at maho beach
http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=1 ... id=1157785
Re: lowest approach ever
Posted:
Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:45 pmby MWISimmer
If it's real, then yes, that's a low approach.. but somehow that shadow doesn't quite add up.
I may be wrong...
Re: lowest approach ever
Posted:
Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:06 pmby Hagar
If it's real, then yes, that's a low approach.. but somehow that shadow doesn't quite add up.
I may be wrong...
Anet is never wrong.
Seriously, the photographer is a regular contributor.
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?photographersearch=RotateI doubt he/she would bother with fakes.
Re: lowest approach ever
Posted:
Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:37 pmby beaky
Maybe I'm seeing things with this head cold, but I think it's real. The high angle of the sun fools you a little... but the foliage spilling over the wall in the background has the same sort of shadow. So does the couple with the dog by the water's edge.
High, attenuated shadows, with the sun behind the left shoulder of the photographer.
On the belly of the plane, I think I can see the distorted reflection of the couple on the blanket. Certainly the other colors, etc. match up.
Re: lowest approach ever
Posted:
Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:21 pmby F3Hadlow
I seriously doubt a fake would make it on A.net.
Re: lowest approach ever
Posted:
Thu Mar 22, 2007 9:25 pmby Papa9571
How much of the fence did the aircraft take with it when it crossed over?
Re: lowest approach ever
Posted:
Thu Mar 22, 2007 9:38 pmby Triple_7
It was discussed on another forum awhile back...its real
Air France was officialy dubbed Air FENCE after coming in a little to low and clipping the fence with a 747
I seriously doubt a fake would make it on A.net.
Youd be surprised. Theres been a few, one even said in the description it was fake...and a pathetic one at that, yet the screeners allowed it...while some of us with decent REAL pics and sometimes rare pics get rejected for the dumbest details
Re: lowest approach ever
Posted:
Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:51 amby Rifleman
We need a ruling from Dave "Fly2e", since he's been there and has first hand experience on this approach........
................Dave ?...........
Re: lowest approach ever
Posted:
Fri Mar 23, 2007 3:46 amby Mushroom_Farmer
If it's real, then yes, that's a low approach.. but somehow that shadow doesn't quite add up.
I may be wrong...
You mean too small?
Re: lowest approach ever
Posted:
Fri Mar 23, 2007 4:01 amby pepper_airborne
That shadow is real! A small part is hidden behind a sand bulge/bump/something so you cant see it.
Re: lowest approach ever
Posted:
Fri Mar 23, 2007 4:03 amby expat
If it is a fake (I do not think so) then someone has gone to extreme lenghs to fake a photo for a website that has more St. Maarten approach pictures that is knows what to do with.
Matt
Re: lowest approach ever
Posted:
Fri Mar 23, 2007 4:06 amby pepper_airborne
Treu
Re: lowest approach ever
Posted:
Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:43 amby MWISimmer
I stand corrected! ;D :)
Re: lowest approach ever
Posted:
Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:48 pmby FsNovice
The shadow may look incorrect from the angle the picture was taken at. But look at it more closely, the beach slopes away, this creates the distorted image.
Re: lowest approach ever
Posted:
Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:21 pmby Jon H
I'm not sure if the plane is as low as the photo makes out. It appears that it's directly over the guy sat on the beach, and he could reach up and touch it. But with a long lens the view gets foreshortened, confusing depth and where things are in the picture.
The aircraft is probably half way between the photographer and the sunbather, and if you look at it with this in mind the plane doesent seem quite as low. (My theory anyway...)
Excelllent shot - great find