The DC-2

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

The DC-2

Postby Theis » Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:48 am

A truly amazing story!!  8-)

http://www.douglasdc3.com/dc2half/dc2half.htm

Cheers Theis
Image Bar by Mees
Image
User avatar
Theis
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4846
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 6:16 am
Location: Denmark

Re: The DC-2

Postby C » Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:13 am

Indeed.

To be fair "1/2" marks are actually reasonably common, often ending up as prototypes of the later model. You also get them with cars too - the facelifted Mazda MX-5 Mk 2 was the Mk 2.5! ;D
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: The DC-2

Postby beaky » Sun Mar 11, 2007 10:46 am

Indeed.

To be fair "1/2" marks are actually reasonably common, often ending up as prototypes of the later model. You also get them with cars too - the facelifted Mazda MX-5 Mk 2 was the Mk 2.5! ;D

It's not an official mark in this case... it was not a prototype, it was a jury rig.
One of my favorite "Gooney" stories... that site, BTW, has tons of great DC-3/Dak info.
Image
User avatar
beaky
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:00 am
Location: Shenandoah, PA USA

Re: The DC-2

Postby C » Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:08 am

[
It's not an official mark in this case... it was not a prototype, it was a jury rig.


"1/2" marks generally aren't official - if they were they'd usually go up to the next number... Another example I was thinking of earlier would be the Meteor Mk 7.5, used by Martin Baker for ejection seat testing - the fuselage and wings of a Mk 7 and the tail assembly of a Mk 8... :)
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: The DC-2

Postby beaky » Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:20 pm

[
It's not an official mark in this case... it was not a prototype, it was a jury rig.


"1/2" marks generally aren't official - if they were they'd usually go up to the next number... Another example I was thinking of earlier would be the Meteor Mk 7.5, used by Martin Baker for ejection seat testing - the fuselage and wings of a Mk 7 and the tail assembly of a Mk 8... :)


What I mean is, this wasn't a production concept- it was hobbled together that way in the field out of desperation.

I don't know which would be scarier... flying the "2 1/2" or flying that other DC-3 that brought the DC-2 wing over... bolted under  the fuselage!!   :o
Image
User avatar
beaky
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:00 am
Location: Shenandoah, PA USA

Re: The DC-2

Postby ashaman » Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:44 am

Old story, and an unsurprising one. Somehow, the Douglas planes were a lot more... robust and durable planes that a lot of others their contemporaries and even more modern ones. Proof is the still important number of re-engined DC8 and DC10 in the cargo business still around, while there's almost no contemporary plane to compare them to, nowadays (not to talk about the not little number of DC3 still flying, some even converted to turboprop). :)
There's but one real cure for human stupidity. It's called DEATH.

At the moment mourning the assassination of sarcasm and irony for the good of the "higher".

Proud FSIX user. Active user of FS98, X-plane and novic
User avatar
ashaman
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1741
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 9:08 am
Location: LIRN

Re: The DC-2

Postby beaky » Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:35 pm

Reminds me of this story:


http://members.tripod.com/~LAMKINS/FrontierCrash.html

Never get tired of that one...good ol' DC-3.  ;D
Image
User avatar
beaky
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:00 am
Location: Shenandoah, PA USA

Re: The DC-2

Postby Jakemaster » Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:25 am

Douglas built them strong.


Sure did!!! ;D
Jakemaster
 


Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 488 guests