Page 1 of 1

The plane that never was...

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:34 pm
by mrjake2002

Re: The plane that never was...

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:13 pm
by F3Hadlow
[quote]http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=1170877

Pretty Cool Huh!

Re: The plane that never was...

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:51 pm
by Ecko
Is there any sign of a propulsion system on this, ehhhm, "machine"? :-?

Re: The plane that never was...

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:01 am
by dcunning30
I haven't yet decided if it's real or a photoshop.

Re: The plane that never was...

PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:06 am
by NDSP
If it got into the air, then im guessing its a one time ride  ::)

Re: The plane that never was...

PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:01 pm
by expat
I haven't yet decided if it's real or a photoshop.


Knowing just how strict Airliners.net are with the images that they post, unlikely to be photshop.

Matt

Re: The plane that never was...

PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:14 pm
by Airshow_lover
And here I thought this was going to be about the SR-75....

Re: The plane that never was...

PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 4:38 pm
by bok269
I wouldnt exactly call it cool.  If you ask me that photo is kind of depressing.

Re: The plane that never was...

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:03 pm
by Ghostrider114
gah! it looks like the bastard child of a Honda Civic and a Cessna Skyhawk

Re: The plane that never was...

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:17 pm
by dcunning30
I dunno, call me stubborn, but there's 3 things that look suspicious to me.  That's why I haven't made up my mind if it's a photoshop or not.

1- the snow line seems odd.  does snow fall like that?
2- structurally, that looks odd, seems there's more window and structure ABOVE the car's roofline.
3- that airplane tail structure looks like it's axis is off-center of the car's center.


Image

Re: The plane that never was...

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:59 pm
by Hagar
[quote]I dunno, call me stubborn, but there's 3 things that look suspicious to me.

Re: The plane that never was...

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:15 pm
by dcunning30
You've convinced me hagar, on 2 points!

1- It's real
2- It's hideous!

:o

Re: The plane that never was...

PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:17 am
by expat
I dunno, call me stubborn, but there's 3 things that look suspicious to me.  That's why I haven't made up my mind if it's a photoshop or not.

1- the snow line seems odd.  does snow fall like that?
2- structurally, that looks odd, seems there's more window and structure ABOVE the car's roofline.
3- that airplane tail structure looks like it's axis is off-center of the car's center.


Image


I must admit it looks very odd. If it's a genuine photo it must be a gimmick. For what it's worth the photographer is a regular contributor to Anet. Felix Goetting

I also found another photo of this strange beastie taken by a different photographer. http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0408720/L/ This shows that your odd "snow line" is in fact white paint.

The registration is fake. Here's a shot of the real D-EDKS http://www1.airpics.com/showimg.php?imgid=99281

PS. Note the position of the lower strut attachment. I can't figure out how they open the doors.


Even though it is not a flyer, is it legal to use the registration of another aircraft? Would that not be the same as me putting a copy of my wifes number plate on my car?

Matt

Re: The plane that never was...

PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:39 am
by Hagar
Even though it is not a flyer, is it legal to use the registration of another aircraft? Would that not be the same as me putting a copy of my wifes number plate on my car?

The same thought had occurred to me. Note that both photos of the "car-plane" are dated 1998. The Mooney photo is dated 2005. I don't know how recently the Mooney was registered or whether this was a brand new registration issued around that date. If it was a UK or US registration I could find out. You will know more about the German regulations than me.