Valid arguments against the Typhoon (go America!)

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Re: Valid arguments against the Typhoon (go Americ

Postby C » Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:00 am

[quote]
I
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Valid arguments against the Typhoon (go Americ

Postby beefhole » Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:59 am

In the end though, Charlie, those were all still US operations, flown primarily by US planes, and overseen by US personnel.  My argument is how nobody does infrastructure better-who do you think moves the blips around? Who manages all this?  There's no argument here, it's all been under US command.

I was making no argument about US being better AA, although we have many more fighters than the UK does (both in different types and overall numbers), all that does is make us more capable-not necissarily any better.  I still think the F/A-18 kicks ass though :P ;)

The point I'm making isn't the US being in more wars, it's the US has had much more practice fighting modern air wars on a mass scale-EVERYTHING I've been saying has been directed at my very first post, where I argue that nobody really does overall management of an air war as well as the US does, because we "have that **** cold".  It doesn't matter what nationality the tanker was that US pilots decided to go to, who was moving the blips around?  That's all I mean.
User avatar
beefhole
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3804
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:57 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Valid arguments against the Typhoon (go Americ

Postby Craig. » Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:06 pm

In the end, i'll take the opinion of the guy whos ass is in the seat of one of her majestys planes, over anyone elses. :)
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: Valid arguments against the Typhoon (go Americ

Postby C » Fri Jul 22, 2005 1:09 pm

[quote]
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Valid arguments against the Typhoon (go Americ

Postby JBaymore » Fri Jul 22, 2005 2:21 pm

My argument is how nobody does infrastructure better-who do you think moves the blips around? Who manages all this? There's no argument here, it's all been under US command.


Beefhole,

Hum....... realtive to the above...... I would like to know what first hand experiences you have had with the US Air Force (or other US military aviation branch), as well as your expereinces with the military aviation branches of say Britian, Israel, Russia, Austrailia, Germany, France and maybe other countries upon which you base your obviously strident comments?

best,

.....................john
Image ImageIntel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 720
User avatar
JBaymore
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 10020
Joined: Sat May 24, 2003 9:15 am
Location: New Hampshire

Re: Valid arguments against the Typhoon (go Americ

Postby beefhole » Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:29 pm


Beefhole,

Hum....... realtive to the above...... I would like to know what first hand experiences you have had with the US Air Force (or other US military aviation branch), as well as your expereinces with the military aviation branches of say Britian, Israel, Russia, Austrailia, Germany, France and maybe other countries upon which you base your obviously strident comments?

best,

.....................john

The friend I referred to in my first post.  He's with the 49th MAG and Marine Intel, so he is right there with everything.  One of his jobs is teaching pilots how our system works, and how the systems of our allies and enemies works.  Just about every word I've typed has been from his mouth-I'll try to state it simply one more time.

We've had more practice.  That's it.  That' the base line of what I'm saying.  We've been taking notes since Vietnam, and that collaboration has lead to a highly tuned air war machine.  Even if other countries could do it just as well, we still have more experience with this specific facet of warfare.  We have the political muscle to force ourselves into a command position? Fine, whatever.  That still means that it's the US personnel that are the ones racking up the experience.  This is my only point.

Britian, Israel, Russia, Austrailia, Germany, France

They haven't fought an air war with hundreds of planes in the air at once, all coordinating through eachother and a CP within the last fifteen years (and for a few of them, longer)

Is that somewhat clearer now?
User avatar
beefhole
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3804
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:57 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Valid arguments against the Typhoon (go Americ

Postby C » Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:35 pm


They haven't fought an air war with hundreds of planes in the air at once, all coordinating through eachother and a CP within the last fifteen years (and for a few of them, longer)

Is that somewhat clearer now?


Look up COMAO, and you'll see that most of the nations were involved in the very same operations...
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Valid arguments against the Typhoon (go Americ

Postby beefhole » Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:45 pm

While COMAO looks like it's about as close as you can get, my original statement is still true ;)
User avatar
beefhole
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3804
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:57 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Valid arguments against the Typhoon (go Americ

Postby Felix/FFDS » Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:54 pm

Let me try to make some sense out of this argument.


#1 - The US has had more "hands on" experience in large scale operations since the end of WW2.

#2 - The US has had more resources - material and personnel - to carry out the operations (see #1).

#3 - The US has had the political clout to make itself the lead in said operations (as well as being the main bankroller)

#4 - The US has developed more command and control systems and experience to carry out large operations.

#5 - Given the above, this is not to say that other nations are not as good (or better) than the US in specific areas/limited operations, and a good argument can be made that systems/tactics/equipment first developed elsewhere have been adopted and adapted for US use (ex.  Canberra, Harrier, Hawk, and a host of others)

Basically, the US is "better" in the sense that they have more resources and money to spend, and have had more opportunities to be in action.

No, I have not been in the military, and my sole qualification to making these statements is old age, and (hopefully) an analytical mind.

And if we're going to drop names, I know a fellow that works in the Office of the Director of Marine Intelligence in Washington DC.
Felix/FFDS
User avatar
Felix/FFDS
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16776432
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 9:42 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Valid arguments against the Typhoon (go Americ

Postby C » Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:00 pm

And if we're going to drop names, I know a fellow that works in the Office of the Director of Marine Intelligence in Washington DC.


Is he related to you Felix or is my memory wandering elsewhere? ;)
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Valid arguments against the Typhoon (go Americ

Postby SilverFox441 » Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:50 pm

The Isrealis are actually the best...

Bekaa Valley, 'nuff said. :)

If you want to go by the standard of "lessons learned" in combat...then Syria, Jordan and Egypt would all rate higher than western forces...although they learned their lessons (assuming they were learned) the hard way.
Steve (Silver Fox) Daly
User avatar
SilverFox441
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 12:54 am
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Re: Valid arguments against the Typhoon (go Americ

Postby C » Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:52 pm

I have no idea which air force is "the best" and I don't much give a damn but no-one has tried to develope their argument here and all that has happened is alot of repetition.


Quite simply because ther isn't a "best" air force. As the latest RAF slogan says though, "Person for person, Pound for Pound, second to none". The RAF, along with all the UK armed forces is used to punching above its weight with its minimal (thanks to several government) resources...
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Valid arguments against the Typhoon (go Americ

Postby Hagar » Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:01 pm

As the latest RAF slogan says though, "Person for person, Pound for Pound, second to none".

Hooray for the RAF.......! :D Jolly good show. I have always believed that & nobody can persuade me otherwise.

I wouldn't expect Beefy to agree. It's perfectly natural that we all think our Air Force is best. Just as well really. ::) ;)
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30854
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Valid arguments against the Typhoon (go Americ

Postby JBaymore » Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:03 pm

[quote]The friend I referred to in my first post.
Last edited by JBaymore on Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image ImageIntel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 720
User avatar
JBaymore
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 10020
Joined: Sat May 24, 2003 9:15 am
Location: New Hampshire

PreviousNext

Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 129 guests