Goodly afternoon Paul...

Adam ""wahubna" hit the nail right on the head when he mentioned controversial aviation topics...

Having owned and flown many types with both types of gear and brakes I think it all comes down to what each individual aviator likes and loves.
For example lets take the DeHavilland of Canada DHC-3 Otter, in the wheel/ski configuration she lands with the tail wheel but on amphibious floats she lands like a nose wheel aircraft. Probably the best STOL Bush Aircraft ever made, she can get into places most so called Bush Aircraft can only dream about.
Our Cessna 185 another aircraft that in the wheel/ski configuration will land with a tail wheel but put amphibious floats on her and she lands like a nose wheel aircraft.
The Grumman Tracker that was in the Royal Canadian Navy used both a nose wheel, tail wheel/roller and tail hook.
Quite the aircraft...
http://www.aviation.technomuses.ca/asse ... racker.pdfHaving put a good many year in the left seat of the Douglas DC3 on wheels and wheel/skis it was a large tail dragger.
Once in the left seat of the Douglas DC4 and 6s I didn't ever care to see another DC3.
Folks think they are a great aircraft, however they have never worked them...

Loading and unloading is either uphill or downhill...