striker wrote:I'm thinking crew at this stage. Maybe captain.
Possibly why it is only the press that are using the word hijacked and the authorities are not............

Matt
striker wrote:I'm thinking crew at this stage. Maybe captain.
Bubblehead wrote:Over a week now all I've heard from aviation and security experts are speculations. But the latest new info regarding the roller coaster ride of the aircraft going from 32K to 43K feet and back down to 23K, something just doesn't add up. I am not a pilot but I'm an avid aviation enthusiast. For you pilots, how long do you think will it take a B777 to go from 32K feet to 43K feet, if it did just that. If the plane was in autopilot can it do that? If there was a struggle in the cockpit, one of the attackers must have been in full control undisturbed for it to go into that type of maneuver. But then how reliable was the radar information that this maneuver actually took place. I'm almost sure that this tragic incident was not the cause of a mechanical failure or sudden explosion. Assuming that it was a hi-jack or terrorist attack, the perpetrators must have been extremely savvy in the inner workings of the aircraft, and there must have been several attackers, perhaps 3 or 4. It's also odd that there were no outgoing communications at all either from the crew, the passengers nor the aircraft itself other than the one from the engines that was thought to be running for five hours since last report. Also if terrorism is a suspect, were there any efforts by authorities to contact relatives and/or friends of the passengers and crew for possible association with the terrorists. Mine is also speculation but I strongly suspect that the plane was flown intact to a specific designation in an orderly deliberate manner for political reason. I hope I am right.
expat wrote:It does not matter why the aircraft has done what it has done, this is the Internet so people will be spouting their beliefs and theories for a 1000 years to come![]()
Matt
C wrote:I see the Malaysian military, particularly the Air Force, are now taking a kicking...
"So Lt, you tracked an object flying at several hundred kts, above 40,000' on your scope, and considered it perfectly normal?" Very lax if true.
Sadly, if it's in the Indian ocean, it may never be found. At least with the AF A330 they knew roughly where it would be.
Bass wrote:expat wrote:It does not matter why the aircraft has done what it has done, this is the Internet so people will be spouting their beliefs and theories for a 1000 years to come![]()
Matt
I think it does matter, Matt! For all of us and those who have lost.
expat wrote:Bass wrote:expat wrote:It does not matter why the aircraft has done what it has done, this is the Internet so people will be spouting their beliefs and theories for a 1000 years to come![]()
Matt
I think it does matter, Matt! For all of us and those who have lost.
Sorry badly worded. I meant that no matter what final reason is given at the very end of the investigation, it will not satisfy large sections Internet. They will be convinced of their own theory as there has been so much misinformation from the start.
Matt
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 158 guests