FS Vs. Real Life

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Re: FS Vs. Real Life

Postby Saratoga » Sun Apr 03, 2005 12:23 pm

Setting up a land 3 in the 767 is harder than a -320, but not by much. Obviously there are some major difference, speeds, flaps, stuff like that, and the weight.

I for one am strongly against Hagar on this one. The 2D panels I like a lot and hope they don't get rid of them anytime soon. I find no enjoyment from having to switch from 3D to 2D or pan down or zoom out incredible amounts so the world looks ridiculous just to check my radar altitude or something to that effect. I would much rather fly an approach, or any part of flight for that matter, from the 2D cockpit than from the DVC.
Pilot for a major US airline certified in the: EMB-120, CRJ, 727, 737, 757, 767, and A-320 and military, T-38, C-130, C-141, and C-5 along with misc. other small airplanes. Any questions, I'm here for you.
User avatar
Saratoga
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 571
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Dallas-Ft. Worth Intl. (KDFW)

Previous

Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 510 guests