Or maybe I'd poop my pants and scream like a little girl...

He wasn't wearing a chute. Check his report.
Exactly my point. Other than an inflight fire, there'd be little point to wearing/using one. Conincidence would have it, on this occasion enough control (albeit inverted) may have allowed its use
This was in 1970 when the regulations were different. Had it been today he would have worn one.
I suspect sport parachutes would be a fair amount smaller and lighter now too compared to 1970 technology.
During my days of beening single and fancy free, I went gliding every weekend that I could. The chutes we wore and still do today where said to be able to save your life if they where opened at the latest passing through 300 feet. I was always skeptical about this until one day a friend of mine was sat in his car with his feet out the door and his back to the inside of the car. His youngest child came up, grabed the "D" ring and ran. The chute deployed..............smashing the the passenger window. There is a rather large and powerful spring to throw the chute out to catch the airflow and save ones life.
Matt
All depends on relative velocities.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 622 guests