by OVERLORD_CHRIS » Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:07 pm
The fact that they want to get rid of US Marshals is stupid:
Since there is no trouble on planes going back and fourth, means the preventive measure of them being there is working. And the moment something does happen, while they are not there, and they live through it some SOB is going to sue the airline for not having proper security.
Getting rid of drinks on planes is just as bad as telling people they can't smoke. Some people want or need a drink on flights to calm their nerves or help them sleep.
And large people all ready have to pay for an extra seat, is there money no longer good enough for the airliner all of a sudden? Jerk!
Bathrooms----On a military flight with 120 people, 2 urinals, and the main bathroom, they are nearly full after a few hours, and he wants to get rid of this???
Flight attendants have been mentioned.
If they want to save weight, here is an idea, do what the military does and request a plane with max lifting with range, so when you are not taking off at 100% Max GVW, you save fuel and go further, that is a no brainier.
Instead of designing planes that have max range empty, load it up to the worst possible weight "cadel car" style with baggage, and see how far it goes and make improvements their, not the other way around, then you would not end up with 3 types of planes:Regular, Extended Range, Long Range, Extended Long Range ect...
