"Red Air" is how the instructor squadron flies at Red Flag in Nellis. During Red Flag they fly US equipment using the tactics and abilities they expect a fictional "Red" opponent would fly. The students fly "Blue Air" and use their systems to their maximum abilities. The concept is that the "Blue" student is confronted with the same capability "Red" opponent they will expect to find in actual combat: lower abilities, lower capabilities, different tactics, command and control, etc.
When US forces participate with other air forces they can do so as "Red" or "Blue" depending on context. For example, if Iraq had an Air Force and the USAF were engaged with them in a training role then the US forces would fly "Red Air" in order to simulate enemies Iraq would be likely to face: Iran. In this role the USAF would fly their planes to mimic the expected capabilities of Iranian aircraft. Likewise I would suspect the USAF often flies "Red Air" with the South Koreans to help train them to confront the North Koreans.
If the US were flying "Red Air" with the IAF then they were mimicing the Pakastani Air Force. This would be political suicide considering how much the Pakastanis are supporting the US engagement in Afghanastan. Essentially the US flying "Red Air" with India would be training the IAF to attack Pakastan. I think Pakastan would object to that.
I was saying that because Chris said that it was two years late for it to have anything to do with F22 funding. I was wondering if he'd taken into account that these exercises took place in 2004.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 557 guests