Airspeed restrictions.

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Re: Airspeed restrictions.

Postby JVC_systems » Thu Jan 01, 2004 2:53 pm

About the turbulence, is it true that smaller airplanes should be more "affraid" of turbulence than bigger once such as 747, 777 etc.?
JVC_systems
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 11:40 pm

Re: Airspeed restrictions.

Postby OTTOL » Thu Jan 01, 2004 9:56 pm


I still beieve it's much easier for ATC to handle the trafic if they were all flying at near the same speed  :)
(Yeah, I'm boneheaded)

;D

What you're failing to do is look at the situation three dimensionally. Most jets posess an initial climb rate in excess of 3000FPM. What this means is that within three minutes of the time a jet leaves the ground, it's easily well above the airspace that MOST small aircraft occupy. ATC also establishes corridors for faster and larger aircraft, and it's rare that we ever even encounter one of those "little guys".
:D
About the turbulence, is it true that smaller airplanes should be more "affraid" of turbulence than bigger once such as 747, 777 etc.?
A smaller aircraft should obviously be more cautious and aware of potential wake turbulence, BUT the most notorious wake creater, the 757, received it's reputation after it was determined to be the culprit in two wake induced crashes involving 737's.
.....so I loaded up the plane and moved to Middle-EEEE..........OIL..that is......
OTTOL
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 742
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 8:36 pm
Location: Fintas, Kuwait (OKBK)

Re: Airspeed restrictions.

Postby JVC_systems » Fri Jan 02, 2004 1:48 pm

OTTOL,
Interesting stuff  :) You said B737 can crash because of turblulence, I was wondering about larger jets. How do they react to turbulence? I was on Delta Air Lines B757 and I remember some rough turbulence during the flight.
JVC_systems
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 11:40 pm

Re: Airspeed restrictions.

Postby OTTOL » Fri Jan 02, 2004 5:27 pm

No aircraft, to date, is immune to the affects of wake turbulence but the 737 is the LARGEST aircraft that I know of that crashed as a result of wake turbulence. The loss of the American Airbus at JFK last year was theorized by some experts to be lost as a result of the preceding B747's wake. I haven't had a camera good enough to capture it yet, but at altitude, when a 767 or 777 passes over us the visible contrail creates two horizontal cyclones that exceed 3X the height of the aircraft itself. As Nexus stated correctly, the SLOWER an aircraft travels, the greater the intensity of the wake. Consequently, a large aircraft on close final must produce an enormous horizontal cylone.
.....so I loaded up the plane and moved to Middle-EEEE..........OIL..that is......
OTTOL
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 742
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 8:36 pm
Location: Fintas, Kuwait (OKBK)

Previous

Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 344 guests