Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Postby BLAZE » Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:00 am

Image
User avatar
BLAZE
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:07 pm
Location: Spring City Pa. United States

Re: Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Postby C » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:44 pm

A short grounding is better than a several hundred million dollar lawsuit should one be lost due to a technical failure, such as a mid atlantic/pacific in flight fire.

:)
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Postby Barkingdog » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:52 pm

inflight fires are taxing and can speed up decision making processes.
User avatar
Barkingdog
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 2:46 pm
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Re: Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Postby BLAZE » Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:56 pm

Yep! at least they nipped this one in the butt before anyone got killed.

It's good they didn't let money get in the way of the publics safety for
a change. Things are looking up.

I wonder how things are going on that whole "Stress Crack" thing?
Image
User avatar
BLAZE
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:07 pm
Location: Spring City Pa. United States

Re: Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Postby wifesaysno » Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:23 pm

Yep! at least they nipped this one in the butt before anyone got killed.

It's good they didn't let money get in the way of the publics safety for
a change. Things are looking up.

I wonder how things are going on that whole "Stress Crack" thing?


From what I have heard from some engineers and draftsman working on the 787, the stress cracks are still a problem but management found a way to cover it up...which is what I heard happened with all the fuel, electrical, hydraulic, and flight control system problems.


I am extremely happy the FAA grounded them now rather than waiting until one went down. Once they fix their mistakes, the 787 should be the next game-changing airliner though. 
wifesaysno
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 7:05 pm

Re: Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Postby Barkingdog » Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:52 pm

Yep! at least they nipped this one in the butt before anyone got killed.

It's good they didn't let money get in the way of the publics safety for
a change. Things are looking up.

I wonder how things are going on that whole "Stress Crack" thing?


From what I have heard from some engineers and draftsman working on the 787, the stress cracks are still a problem but management found a way to cover it up...which is what I heard happened with all the fuel, electrical, hydraulic, and flight control system problems.


I am extremely happy the FAA grounded them now rather than waiting until one went down. Once they fix their mistakes, the 787 should be the next game-changing airliner though.
User avatar
Barkingdog
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 2:46 pm
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Re: Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Postby Steve M » Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:38 pm

How many high tech aircraft never have a problem after roll out? and first run production? Even the classic airliners usually had some clean up after the first production runs..
Image
User avatar
Steve M
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4765
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:02 pm
Location: Cambridge On.

Re: Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Postby wifesaysno » Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:50 pm

Yep! at least they nipped this one in the butt before anyone got killed.

It's good they didn't let money get in the way of the publics safety for
a change. Things are looking up.

I wonder how things are going on that whole "Stress Crack" thing?


From what I have heard from some engineers and draftsman working on the 787, the stress cracks are still a problem but management found a way to cover it up...which is what I heard happened with all the fuel, electrical, hydraulic, and flight control system problems.


I am extremely happy the FAA grounded them now rather than waiting until one went down. Once they fix their mistakes, the 787 should be the next game-changing airliner though.
Last edited by wifesaysno on Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
wifesaysno
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 7:05 pm

Re: Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Postby wifesaysno » Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:02 pm

How many high tech aircraft never have a problem after roll out? and first run production? Even the classic airliners usually had some clean up after the first production runs..


Very true, but the source of concern for me was how much Boeing has been talking down issues like planes catching fire, leaking fuel, carbon fiber delamination, brake failures, and even windshields cracking especially considering it already entered passenger service. Safety is an issue when planes are carrying paying passengers. I believe the 787 program will be successful, but I firmly believe some fishy stuff happened/is happening at the top levels of the program.

Airliners in service need to be safe. Yes all new aircraft have issues, but having so many different issues pop up on so many airframes so fast is very shocking. An issue here and there is 100% normal, but not this many this often.
Last edited by wifesaysno on Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
wifesaysno
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 7:05 pm

Re: Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Postby expat » Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:16 pm

Yep! at least they nipped this one in the butt before anyone got killed.

It's good they didn't let money get in the way of the publics safety for
a change. Things are looking up.

I wonder how things are going on that whole "Stress Crack" thing?


From what I have heard from some engineers and draftsman working on the 787, the stress cracks are still a problem but management found a way to cover it up...which is what I heard happened with all the fuel, electrical, hydraulic, and flight control system problems.


I am extremely happy the FAA grounded them now rather than waiting until one went down. Once they fix their mistakes, the 787 should be the next game-changing airliner though.
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Postby wifesaysno » Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:38 pm

:o
Good grief Matt!
I did not know that about the 737's. Very disturbing stuff.

I am very thankful no one needed to die for the FAA to check the 787, hopefully this is a start of a massive wake-up call for Boeing.
They really need to start living up to there legacy:
(**some of you may disagree with a few, I made a few generalizations**)
1st monoplane American fighter: Boeing P-26
1st successful jetliner: Boeing 707
1st jumbo jet: Boeing 747
1st, 2nd, and 3rd USAF tankers: Boeing KB-29, Boeing KC-97, Boeing KC-135
1st practical strategic airlifter: Boeing C-97
1st 'wide body' land based airliner:Boeing 337
1st true strategic bomber for USAF: Boeing B-29
1st true strategic bomber for Soviet Air Force (VVO): copy of Boeing B-29 (the Tu-4)
1st nuclear bomber: Boeing B-29
1st jet powered heavy bomber in US: Boeing B-47
1st monoplane passenger plane: Boeing Monomail
1st 'modern' pressurized airliner: Boeing 247
Bomber with most payload: Boeing B-52
#1 airliner in history: Boeing 737
Most famous WW2 bomber (in US at least): Boeing B-17

Boeing has an incredible history. It is time to start living up to their reputation.
wifesaysno
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 7:05 pm

Re: Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Postby Steve M » Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:42 pm

I just cancelled my flight to the Caymans. Me and the wife will be swimming there.  8-)
Image
User avatar
Steve M
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4765
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:02 pm
Location: Cambridge On.

Re: Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Postby Barkingdog » Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:12 pm

i am reminded that i live in a time very different from when i was young. you could count on things being on the up and up and on a mans word.

im anti government. i take with a grain of salt most anything printed. but to know someone in the mire, well that can change things.

i miss flying. i miss all the wonderful liberating things that went with it. Nine Eleven changed all that.
Last edited by Barkingdog on Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Barkingdog
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 2:46 pm
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Re: Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Postby BLAZE » Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:43 pm

It may be that boeing is not being dishonest in there claims of quality over
quantity. I meen, come on, they're not murders and they sure as hell don't want
to loose all they've worked for all these years.

I think they need to take a long hard look at the workers on the line. like they say
"Your Only As Good As Your Weakest Link"

If you are not 110% obsessed with your own quality and workmanship, then you
have NO damn business being on the any aircraft production line.

The only other production line I can think of that's this important is submarines. No
room for error! Why do submarines have a much better safety record? because the
line workers are military trained to be obsessed with there own quality and workman-
ship

They can weed out alot of these week links by focusing on the outside contractors.
I think that's a huge problem.
Image
User avatar
BLAZE
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:07 pm
Location: Spring City Pa. United States

Re: Boeing's 787 Dreamliner OUCH!

Postby BrandonF » Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:33 pm

Another detail that should be noted is that the battery that is having issues on the 787 is not actually built by Boeing, but rather a Japanese company.
BrandonF
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2288
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:37 pm

Next

Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 688 guests