Flight 447 report

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Flight 447 report

Postby ozzy72 » Mon Jul 09, 2012 11:16 am

Image
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
User avatar
ozzy72
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 33284
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:45 am
Location: Madsville

Re: Flight 447 report

Postby expat » Mon Jul 09, 2012 12:50 pm

That was a surprising read. Normally reports about French aircraft and French aero companies are somewhat thin on facts and is the fault of anyone except the people or companies involved when done by the BEA..... :-/

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: Flight 447 report

Postby tcco94 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:24 am

This might just be my opinion but if anyone should be blamed the pilot crew should be last. I think that this was more of a wake up call for the training given to commercial pilots. Clearly this was a situation no one had thought of happening and for that matter no one had trained these, and probably many others, how to correctly fix this problem.

I read this quote from a report...

"No one was trained for high-altitude stall recovery in the cockpit. It's not part of the normal training curriculum...this is something that really has to be reformed globally. This is a really big deal."


This crash is very unfortunate and sad but it's a huge learning step for future commercial pilots. Whenever I see any article that states blame towards the crew, or how easy it would have been to avoid, it really seems to put me in a bad mood. It's easy for us to say "how this could have been avoided" when before no one obviously planned for it to happen.

For a crew in a panic situation with little to no training on the subject it seems to me that any other pilot put in that situation wouldn't have done much better.
User avatar
tcco94
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 1:41 am
Location: Bay Area, California


Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 295 guests