Sukhoi Superjet crash

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Sukhoi Superjet crash

Postby Ivan » Wed May 09, 2012 1:47 pm

On customer demo flight in Indonesia

Cause unknown yet, speculations about pushing the plane to the limits over mountainous terrain
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: Sukhoi Superjet crash

Postby Rocket_Bird » Wed May 09, 2012 7:27 pm

That's horrible.  RIP those who were on board.

Terrible too given the design state of this jet, after struggling so hard to just get orders from different airlines.  This is one of those underdog designs that I had hoped to see make a bigger presence in the airline industry.  Undoubtedly, this would complicate things.
Cheers,
RB

Image
User avatar
Rocket_Bird
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1222
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Sukhoi Superjet crash

Postby expat » Thu May 10, 2012 5:37 am

This is one of those underdog designs that I had hoped to see make a bigger presence in the airline industry.




Having had an up close and personal look at this aircraft, I hope it does not. It looks like it was assembled by former construction workers at a tank factors deep in Siberia. Saying that, I would not wish this incident on anyone. I have quite a bit of experience dealing with Russians and civil aircraft. They go as well together as Obama canvasing in the Deep South. Russians should stick to Military aircraft and stay well away from building passenger aircraft. In fact I would never knowingly fly on any Russian owned/operated passenger aircraft even if it was a Boeing or an Airbus.

Matt
Last edited by expat on Thu May 10, 2012 5:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: Sukhoi Superjet crash

Postby ozzy72 » Thu May 10, 2012 2:47 pm

First reports indicate that the plane crashed into the side of a volcano and there are no survivors :'(
Image
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
User avatar
ozzy72
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 33284
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:45 am
Location: Madsville

Re: Sukhoi Superjet crash

Postby ftldave » Thu May 10, 2012 3:50 pm

Having had an up close and personal look at this aircraft, I hope it does not. It looks like it was assembled by former construction workers at a tank factors deep in Siberia. Saying that, I would not wish this incident on anyone. I have quite a bit of experience dealing with Russians and civil aircraft. They go as well together as Obama canvasing in the Deep South. Russians should stick to Military aircraft and stay well away from building passenger aircraft. In fact I would never knowingly fly on any Russian owned/operated passenger aircraft even if it was a Boeing or an Airbus.

Matt


In its time Aeroflot was the biggest airline in the world. I've flown on their Boeings, Airbuses, and even Tupolev-154Ms a few times, right before those were retired. Millions fly on Russian airliners in safety every year. Poor maintenance and pilot error can happen on any airline anywhere in the world. Fact is, the Russian airline industry is all but gone, collapsed along with the USSR. They don't manufacture much of anything these days except cheap-but-effective military hardware. Having flown on many airlines, Aeroflot actually serves the best food, the cute flight attendants are an eyeful, but it's the godawful Russian airports that I dread, certainly the worst in the world. Compared to a dreaded layover at Sheremyetevo airport, flying in their planes is nothing!

No accounting about the south, expat. My Armenian-born wife compares the southern racists and rednecks she has met during our travels with the ignorant Russian oafs she had to deal with at Moscow State University: Loud-mouthed, dumbed down, ambitious-without-qualifications, vindictive, not to mention alcoholic. I guess people are just the same all over.
"Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing."
User avatar
ftldave
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 11:45 am
Location: Bloomington, Indiana, USA

Re: Sukhoi Superjet crash

Postby Rocket_Bird » Thu May 10, 2012 5:24 pm

This is one of those underdog designs that I had hoped to see make a bigger presence in the airline industry.




Having had an up close and personal look at this aircraft, I hope it does not. It looks like it was assembled by former construction workers at a tank factors deep in Siberia. Saying that, I would not wish this incident on anyone. I have quite a bit of experience dealing with Russians and civil aircraft. They go as well together as Obama canvasing in the Deep South. Russians should stick to Military aircraft and stay well away from building passenger aircraft. In fact I would never knowingly fly on any Russian owned/operated passenger aircraft even if it was a Boeing or an Airbus.

Matt


Didn't know it was that bad.  What pictures and vids I've saw of the Sukhoi jet I thought looked pretty promising.  But then, I've never seen one up close. 
Cheers,
RB

Image
User avatar
Rocket_Bird
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1222
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Sukhoi Superjet crash

Postby expat » Fri May 11, 2012 2:37 am

I get to look under the floor boards so to say of Russian owned/operated aircraft and have to correct the errors and repairs as more than line maintenance is not approved on Western aircraft or is very hard to get. Any Russian aircraft flying into Europe has to be maintained under EASA part 145 (as do all aircraft). The standards are not high enough to gain this. There are a couple of companies that have managed it, but only for single aircraft types. You cannot fix a Boeing or an Airbus with a hammer, some pop rivets and a couple of screw drivers. Most of the time it is more by luck than judgement serious accidents don't happen and when they do, have you noticed in Russia that it is ALWAYS pilot error?????? Easy to blame the dead than to fix a complete system.

Matt
Last edited by expat on Fri May 11, 2012 2:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....


Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 408 guests