by expat » Fri May 02, 2008 3:27 am
I see it from both sides of the fence and to digress slightly and I would not say Steve Fosset falls in to this category, but, if you out unprepared and get into trouble, then why should you not be billed for being rescued. We see it time and time again, idiots who try to day trip across the Channel with nothing but a rowing boat and a Mars Bar, or people people who go for a walk in the mountains with a shower cap in their pocket just in case it rains. If you get into problems due to your own stupidity, then yes you should have to pay. It should have nothing to do with how much tax you think you have payed. Steve Fossett, would not have fallen into this sort of category, but would have probably taken a calculated risk or two from time to time. Some people would say, he has enough money, so he should pay, others would say why should he be treated any differently. Or, when you have more in loose change on you night table than most earn in a life time, may be a nice donation to the bodies that where looking for you would have been seen as nice gesture and who knows, bill, what bill............................I would suspect, once it all comes out in the wash that this was suggested and ignored hense the bill. Lets face it, some of the richest people in the world are also some of the meanest, widows in particular.
Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.
PETA

People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.