A 747 in California

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Re: A 747 in California

Postby flyboy 28 » Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:04 am

The 747 program for Evergreen has been scrapped. They're only using them as freighters.
User avatar
flyboy 28
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10264
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 4:01 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: A 747 in California

Postby Ivan » Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:33 pm

The 747 program for Evergreen has been scrapped. They're only using them as freighters.

For the simple reason that once converted they lose the lower hold....

The Il-76 palletized solution is a proven one
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: A 747 in California

Postby Wii » Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:39 pm

[quote][quote]This project has been going on for a
User avatar
Wii
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2727
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Space

Re: A 747 in California

Postby OVERLORD_CHRIS » Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:09 pm

I believe the project was abandoned, the aircraft stripped out, and has now returned to cargo flights again.

The FAA wouldn't allow the use of the aircraft over federal ground, as it had not received the correct certification. So in fairness, (yes some areas it would be) it wouldn't be able to be used very widely anyway in the current fires.

They have not abandoned it, I see it at work at least every other week when it comes in and gets cargo, they just have drain plugs over the 3 holes in the back bottom. If they let them us it, and it goes as planed, they have 2nd newer 747 waiting to be converted, one that is a side loader instead of the nose loader like that one.

Evergreen has just been fighting all the BS paper work that they keep throwing at them for reasons why they don't want them to use it. Mainly they keep bring up the aircraft age, and how it was not designed to dump water like a C-130 was(130A was not built with the future thought of fighting fires), and they are worried that if it were to go down because the heated air that it would cause as big a fire as it just put out.  
Image
User avatar
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1136
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:56 am
Location: Chalreston SC

Previous

Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 559 guests