Meeting Tristar/DC10 task

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Meeting Tristar/DC10 task

Postby chornedsnorkack » Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:39 am

Tristar and DC-10 were built to meet the same design task:

On a hot summer day, they had to take off from La Guardia notoriously short runway with full payload and fuel for trip, with safety margin for one engine out

and on a hot summer day, they had to take off from Denver, with full fuel and payload, and in case of one engine out, still cross the Rockies.

Both Lockheed and Douglas started to design twinjets towards those targets in 1966 or so, then gave up trying and chose trijets.

A300 program started 1966-1967, simultaneously with Tristar and DC-10 - and they stuck to twin.

Later on, Boeing joined the twin widebody production with 767.

Can A300 meet the La Guardia and Denver requirements? Can B767? What about A330? Or B777?
chornedsnorkack
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 4:35 am

Re: Meeting Tristar/DC10 task

Postby Mictheslik » Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:41 am

Dont know quite what this has to do with 3D design??

.mic
[center]Image
User avatar
Mictheslik
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5517
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:32 am
Location: Bristol, England

Re: Meeting Tristar/DC10 task

Postby chornedsnorkack » Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:54 am

Dont know quite what this has to do with 3D design??

.mic

Does not and does not need to.

The topic of the forum is "Aircraft & 3D Design" So, it is Aircraft Design and 3d Design.

This obviously has to do with Aircraft Design. How did Lockheed and Douglas go about meeting restrictive airpord performance requirements? And how did/do Airbus and Boeing?
chornedsnorkack
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 4:35 am

Re: Meeting Tristar/DC10 task

Postby SkyNoz » Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:16 pm

Does not and does not need to.

The topic of the forum is "Aircraft & 3D Design" So, it is Aircraft Design and 3d Design.

This obviously has to do with Aircraft Design. How did Lockheed and Douglas go about meeting restrictive airpord performance requirements? And how did/do Airbus and Boeing?


Well, the option of having that extra third engine in the tail, helps significantly. If you could calculate the thrust provided by the eninges in relation to aircraft weight, it's easily has enough power to fly a consederble distance.

Other then the wide body availabillity of landing at La Guardia, that's something you can actually test in Flightsim. If you really can try and download the performance sheets of those aircraft and look at max takeoff runway distance ect. that would easily answer you question wheather the aircraft mentioned can make it out of that airport. ;D
Last edited by SkyNoz on Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Project Kfir!
Image
My Gmax page
Aircraft modeler/Aircarft painter

Aye the key!
[GeneralEngineData]
//0=Piston, 1=Jet, 2=N
SkyNoz
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1703
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 11:02 am

Re: Meeting Tristar/DC10 task

Postby Lazerbeak » Thu Aug 24, 2006 6:15 pm

For the record, this forum is dedicated to virtual aircraft design. As in, aircraft design in terms of 3D modelling, etc.

If you have a question about actual real-world aircraft design, then the "Real Aviation" forum located southwards is what you're looking for.
Image

The proletarians of the world have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. WORKERS OF THE WORLD, UNITE!
User avatar
Lazerbeak
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 703
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:21 pm
Location: A house.

Re: Meeting Tristar/DC10 task

Postby Felix/FFDS » Thu Aug 24, 2006 8:54 pm

Moved.
Felix/FFDS
User avatar
Felix/FFDS
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16776435
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 9:42 am
Location: Orlando, FL


Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 514 guests