Just what Biggin Hill didn't need...

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Just what Biggin Hill didn't need...

Postby C » Sat Oct 22, 2005 9:23 am

With all the "NIMBY" pressure around the airfield, particularly following the Vampire and Kingcobra crashes in 2001, this is the last thing the airport needed. At least it didn't hit any residential buildings, which may be due to the sacrifice of the crew...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/4366984.stm
Last edited by C on Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Just what Biggin Hill didn't need...

Postby Saitek » Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:44 am

Just saw it and came to say... very sad. :(
Windows 7 Pro 64bit
Intel Core 2 Duo E2180 2GHz
GA-P35-DS3L Intel P35
Kingston HyperX 4GB (2x2) DDR2 6400C4 800Mhz
GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
2 x 22" monitors
200GB Sata
Be Quiet! Straight Power 650W

Flying FS
Saitek
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5274
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 3:04 pm
Location: UK

Re: Just what Biggin Hill didn't need...

Postby ozzy72 » Sun Oct 23, 2005 1:32 am

:( :( :(
Image
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
User avatar
ozzy72
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 33284
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:45 am
Location: Madsville

Re: Just what Biggin Hill didn't need...

Postby Tweek » Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:32 am

Well, atleast it wasn't at the airshow. It was hardly anything to do with Biggin Hill itself. Neither were the Vampire and Kingcobra crashes. Never good to see a crashed plane with a student in...
Tweek
 

Re: Just what Biggin Hill didn't need...

Postby C » Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:55 am

Well, atleast it wasn't at the airshow. It was hardly anything to do with Biggin Hill itself. Neither were the Vampire and Kingcobra crashes. Never good to see a crashed plane with a student in...


Unfortunately that isn't how a lot of people will see it. To certain groups it was another aeroplane using (based at) Biggin Hill that crashed in a residential area very, very close to houses.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Just what Biggin Hill didn't need...

Postby Tweek » Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:14 pm

Unfortunately that isn't how a lot of people will see it. To certain groups it was another aeroplane using (based at) Biggin Hill that crashed in a residential area very, very close to houses.


That's the problem though. People think too negatively.

For example, in 1975, a train derailed at Nuneaton station, and ploughed onto the platform. 6 people were killed, 38 were injured. Does that make a railway station platform an unsafe place? Is it a common occurance? No. But the problem is, once it's happened, people get slightly paranoid. Just wish that wasn't the case.

And I use the term 'people' in relation to the people that I'm actually referring to, not everyone :P
Tweek
 

Re: Just what Biggin Hill didn't need...

Postby C » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:07 pm

...and unfortunately I use the term "people" to refer to the people who actively seek to have Biggin Hill closed...
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth


Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 476 guests