Flight Simulator and other chat
https://forums.simviation.com/phpBB3/
https://forums.simviation.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=95641
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:12 amPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:15 amPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:22 pm
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:49 ami cant tell exactly which model it is, but it is a FORD!!!
0-180mph ~ 2 SECONDS
Hehe! Is that for real? If so, LOL!
Sorry, just had to throw a joke in there, hope you dont mind. This is the only thing I could think of.
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:07 am
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:02 am
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:23 amAny halfway decent motorbike can beat that
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:07 pmPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:18 pm Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:21 pm 8-)Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:22 pmPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:44 amBuggatti Veyron does 0-62 in 2.5 seconds. And that is also not a light vehicle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bugatti_Veyron
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:49 amImagine what kind of power plant you'd need to get the time down to 2.0 !
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 5:27 amBuggatti Veyron does 0-62 in 2.5 seconds. And that is also not a light vehicle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bugatti_Veyron
That is a con. 0 to 62 mph. Why 62 mph when the industry standard is 60 mph. Because if it was 60 mph you would not have a nice round 2.5 seconds and it would appear "slow".
Matt
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 5:36 amBuggatti Veyron does 0-62 in 2.5 seconds. And that is also not a light vehicle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bugatti_Veyron
That is a con. 0 to 62 mph. Why 62 mph when the industry standard is 60 mph. Because if it was 60 mph you would not have a nice round 2.5 seconds and it would appear "slow".
Matt
Ah but thanks to the metric loving Europeans, 0-62 is becoming standard because they work on 0-100km/h
.... ...!
...!...!