An interesting point of view of Michael Andretti's short and rather unimpressive F1 run.
If true, especially the point of Senna letting him drive his car for Monza, then I not only have more respect for Senna's personality, the man was willing to drive a car he suspected as being both sabotaged and also unsafe to help a team mate out, against his own team. But it also further prooves my dislike for Mclaren.
It also brings up so many what if's. Was this partly why Senna chose to leave and drive for Williams. If so where would F1 be now had that not been the case and Ron had let them compete properly? Maybe Andretti would have been much better, and he might have gone to Williams to give Hakkinen the seat, maybe Mikka may not of even got the drive so soon and those two world titles might have gone to someone else like Senna.
Seems to sort of perhaps ring bells of last year
Ron it would appear doesn't like his star driver being pushed to the limits?
There was always something to be said of Ferrari and their choice of team mates for Schumi, but the reality was during his career, with the exception of Mikka there wasn't anyone on the grid who could have driven with and beat him consistantly.
Mclaren perhaps should take the lesson and just shove someone in the second seat who really isn't that good but will score points when you need them too. I think personally Heikki will really turn it up a notch over the next few races and really cause Lewis some problems. Guess he better watch out for loose wheel nuts.
