Question on the Mustang!

With a lot of interest in Auto's here, only wingless machines please!

Re: Question on the Mustang!

Postby Craig. » Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:02 pm

Not likely. And the price on one would be close to
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: Question on the Mustang!

Postby Craig. » Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:13 pm

while yes the mustang is more powerful. the BMW is a better ride overall. Trust me i hate the things, but they dont break down in tears at a sharp corner ;D
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: Question on the Mustang!

Postby Craig. » Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:33 pm

dont let my comments on the mustag put ya off. I personally love the car, although i like the 90's model more, has a sporty look to it. If i were to go with the original style i would by the original mustang. Its just personal preferances. best bet is to look through the auto trader website and get an idea of prices near you.
I sent you a PM about your insurance aswell.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: Question on the Mustang!

Postby BMan1113VR » Tue Jul 12, 2005 7:15 pm

don't go for an auto GT

and we won't be getting the shelby model till next year

i am sorry to say, but i have never heard of any right hand drive mustangs of any year (except a few old race cars)
Sincerely,
Me

SimV NFL 2006-2007 Season Pool Co-Champion (157-99; 9-2)
SimV NFL 2005-2006 Season Pool Co-Champion (163-93)
SimV NFL 2004-2005 Season Pool Champion (1
User avatar
BMan1113VR
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8661
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2002 12:37 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California

Re: Question on the Mustang!

Postby RichieB16 » Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:37 pm

Have there been any reports on the reliability of the new mustangs?

I haven't heard much either way.  They haven't been out long enough to discover what kind of problems they may have as they get older and more worn out.  Thusfar there has been no major problems brought up and they sure are a nice looking car (and thats hard for a Camaro guy to say).  But, nothing has been released that say they are unreliable.
User avatar
RichieB16
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3662
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 11:46 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: Question on the Mustang!

Postby elwellnick24 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 11:15 am

you'll get used to the right hand no problem. i ran an e30 bmw m3 for 2 years, which were only made in lhd, and after a short while it was ok. overtaking can be a bit dodgy, but apart from that it was fine  :)
amd 3400+
1 gig ddr
6600gt
soundblaster audigy zs platinum pro
elwellnick24
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:09 am
Location: worcs, england

Re: Question on the Mustang!

Postby The Ruptured Duck » Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:21 pm

Ok, as a Mustang enthusiest, I feel compelled to say something.

No chance of you buying a GT500 (especially in the UK)

little chance of you buying a right seat '05.

Mustangs are reliable from 1996-present

I love my 1998, but if you don't like the looks, go for a 2000-2004 model(if you like those)


Why do people not like the 1994-1998 models?  I love them!  The only beef I have with them, is they don't quite look like a race car, unless you try to make an RS.  

may I recommend a Ford Ka, or a Toyota Prius if you are thinking about a new car.  Trust me, in 3 years, you will know why.
"If you would not be forgotten, as soon as you are dead and rotten, either write things worth reading, or do things worth the writing" -Ben Franklin

"Man must rise above the Earth to the top of the atmosphere and beyond, for only
User avatar
The Ruptured Duck
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2282
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: Question on the Mustang!

Postby RichieB16 » Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:24 pm

[quote]Why do people not like the 1994-1998 models?
User avatar
RichieB16
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3662
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 11:46 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: Question on the Mustang!

Postby The Ruptured Duck » Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:46 pm

Yes the 2000-2004 models are more agressive looking, and they look more like real road racers.  Thats why the Cobra R was developed.

Oh, I fergot to mention something about buying a Mustang.  Good luke parking it in the tight streets in the UK
"If you would not be forgotten, as soon as you are dead and rotten, either write things worth reading, or do things worth the writing" -Ben Franklin

"Man must rise above the Earth to the top of the atmosphere and beyond, for only
User avatar
The Ruptured Duck
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2282
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: Question on the Mustang!

Postby Craig. » Sat Jul 16, 2005 7:46 am

the standard mustang is no problem on our streets really. my uncles rover 75 is bigger and they are a very common car round here. Our streets arnt as small and tight as people think. And anything you saw round London is not a common thing round the country. Villages can be a problem some times but Jeremy clarkson managed to get the Hummer H1 through some tight streets once so again not a huge problem.
Why do people not like the 1994-1998 models?
My personal fav, theres a place about 10 miles from here thats an american car specialist has a lot full of camaros both 96 style and 2000 style onwards. Mustangs old and new style Dodge rams firebirds allsorts. Again though both cost (a 96 mustang here is about ($8000+) and insurance (i was quoted best $6000) a year. makes owning one before turning 25 almost impossible. And with gas being $7 a gallon almost they arnt great commuting cars.
Last edited by Craig. on Sat Jul 16, 2005 7:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Next

Return to Autos

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 264 guests