Why not?

With a lot of interest in Auto's here, only wingless machines please!

Why not?

Postby The Ruptured Duck » Sun Nov 25, 2007 11:59 am

If engine development stops after this year, will there be research into CVT's?  Are there any regs forbidding it?

More fuel efficient, and faster, if the teams build one that could withstand the torque of an F-1 engine, they would have an advantage.
"If you would not be forgotten, as soon as you are dead and rotten, either write things worth reading, or do things worth the writing" -Ben Franklin

"Man must rise above the Earth to the top of the atmosphere and beyond, for only
User avatar
The Ruptured Duck
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2282
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: Why not?

Postby Ivan » Sun Nov 25, 2007 4:23 pm

[quote]If engine development stops after this year, will there be research into CVT's?
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: Why not?

Postby Craig. » Sun Nov 25, 2007 4:51 pm

re-useable energy is the next step. Energy used from braking will be returned to the engine in a storage capacity for useage as a power boost type system.
Although I'd like your idea in F1.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham


Return to Autos

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 435 guests