Page 1 of 1

Now this is bad investment.

PostPosted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 9:14 pm
by Katahu
This guy may have wasted his hard-earned cash on something that unknowingly has problems, but at least he provides a review what he experienced and is helping us avoid the experiences he had.

Go to this link and you'll see what I'm talking about.

http://www.fsinflight.com/FSI6%20CONTEN ... 2%20JY.htm

It may be a long review, but the intensive reading is well worth it.

Re: Now this is bad investment.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2003 5:54 pm
by KDSM
nah he didnt waste his money he says he "had a chance to review the scenery"  Which  means he got it for free

Re: Now this is bad investment.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2003 6:52 pm
by Katahu
he said REview, not PREview.

Re: Now this is bad investment.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:08 pm
by Hagar
he said REview, not PREview.

As I understand it a review is a report on something on sale while a preview is of something that has not yet been released. In that case, the word review seems appropriate.

I wouldn't purchase an FS addon myself but Flight One are a reputable company & I understand their products are generally excellent. They might well take offence at the title of this topic. I know I would in their position. Please remember that any review/preview is one person's opinion. My own opinion is invariably the exact opposite & I rarely take much notice of them.

Re: Now this is bad investment.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2003 9:57 pm
by chomp_rock
What a waste of time and money!

Re: Now this is bad investment.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 27, 2003 2:03 am
by KDSM
"Then out of the blue an opportunity arose - an invitation to review the scenery and of course I jumped at the chance."

he got it for free  ;)

Re: Now this is bad investment.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 27, 2003 3:09 am
by atingle
Actually for your information we at FSI have purchased many of the add-ons we review. Also, you imply that, when we are provided with an add-on for "free" that this has a bearing on the type of review the add-on concerned gets.

You are wrong - for example, I got the PF F117 for "free" but paid for the CS F104.

Re: Now this is bad investment.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 27, 2003 7:04 am
by bm
While i've got the chance (not really to do with the topic) I think your magazine is absolutely great, keep up the good work!

This guy may have wasted his hard-earned cash on something that unknowingly has problems, but at least he provides a review what he experienced and is helping us avoid the experiences he had.

Thats the whole point of the review, to give something a rating. If they only reviewed the best stuff what would be the point?

Re: Now this is bad investment.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 27, 2003 8:55 am
by KDSM
Actually for your information we at FSI have purchased many of the add-ons we review. Also, you imply that, when we are provided with an add-on for "free" that this has a bearing on the type of review the add-on concerned gets.

You are wrong - for example, I got the PF F117 for "free" but paid for the CS F104.







Im not saying your review is biased but that one sentence does imply that the software was provided for you to review.

of course there is no way for me to know for sure so, if i am wrong then i publicly apologize.