NEW Milviz DHC2 Beaver coming !!!
Posted:
Fri May 20, 2016 10:11 amby Jetranger
Apparently MILVIZ has been secretly working on developing a NEW more realistic DHC2 Beaver
its still a work in progress / NOT released yet.
don't know if its for FSX or X Plane or
??
I'm just passin the info I find out about
MILVIZ Link :
http://milviz.com/flight/ enjoy the video
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wv92ZjoLorA[/youtube]
Re: NEW Milviz DHC2 Beaver coming !!!
Posted:
Fri May 20, 2016 3:07 pmby Jean Loup
Re: NEW Milviz DHC2 Beaver coming !!!
Posted:
Fri May 20, 2016 3:40 pmby Fozzer
Some nice photographs of an eager beaver courtesy of Flyer magazine...>>>
http://www.flyer.co.uk/dhc-2-beaver/Paul...
...!
Re: NEW Milviz DHC2 Beaver coming !!!
Posted:
Fri May 20, 2016 4:25 pmby OldAirmail
Hold on, just wait a minute. This must be an "As is" sale.
They're not even trying to clean it up. I say pass on this one.
Re: NEW Milviz DHC2 Beaver coming !!!
Posted:
Fri May 20, 2016 5:39 pmby Shadowcaster
That looks like it will be a real beauty, definitely want that in the hanger.
Cheers
Rich
Re: NEW Milviz DHC2 Beaver coming !!!
Posted:
Fri May 20, 2016 7:43 pmby FlexibleFlier
I love the Beaver and spend a lot of time flying it, including the Aerosoft version. Much as I appreciate the idea of a new one - better? eye candier? - there are still a lot of fine aircraft that haven't been developed by talented people who could bring a whole new experience to the table. For example, I happen to like helicopters (I flew them professionally for 20+ years) and would get very excited about an updated S-76, or the old S-58, both round motor and PT-6 turbine versions, or the AS365 Twin Dauphin and it's progenitor the AS360 Dauphin (single turbine engine), etc., etc. There are plenty of fixed wings that could use a skilled developer's touch, like the Piper PA-23 Apache (the forerunner of the PA-23 Aztec), or some of the 1930's racers, or the Sud Caravelle airliner, etc., etc.
I like MilViz and have a few of their products. I just think it would be nice to address some aircraft that haven't been done rather than rehash something that, while perhaps a bit dated, has been doing okay for a long time.
