by H » Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:10 pm
I don't know how geographically specific you're attempting to be. Scapa Flow should be an integral part of Scotland scenery and may not be in a seperate .zip, so check your 'Scotland' sceneries.
Are you actually to use this for 2k2 or intending to slip it into your CFS2 folder? I started a small 'CFS'1 Pacific island mission series over a year ago and had to use an alternate 'FS' island because, although too modern, at least Ronalap hasn't changed runway count and shape as much since WW2... and Roi-Namur, what I should use, are nowadays merged into one island and two of the, perhaps more important, runways are gone.
I recently rendered my complaint elsewhere that I still have a World Trade Center where no such World Trade Center now is. I still contend that the (static) object .bgl should be seperate from the geographical .bgl (scenery), especially in CFS but in FS, as well -- that is, buildings, vehicles, planes, etc., shouldn't be an intregal part of the geographical scenery just because it is expected that they won't be going anywhere; the geographical .bgl should just be the (usually) more slowly changing features of Mother Earth and 'static' object shouldn't be all that static. If you wish to portray a disaster, your house or hanger then floats or is blown away.
I seem to have gotten a bit carried away, again... maybe we should link this in the Scenery department. 
Edit: I see Shane posted during the time this sat in notepad, betwixt my time of typing and posting it. 
8-)
Last edited by
H on Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
