fs2002 standard/pro

Flight Simulator 2002. Questions, suggestions, problems or solutions... aim here!

Re: fs2002 standard/pro

Postby RollerBall » Fri Jul 18, 2003 11:38 am

Fraid I don't follow this at all.

The Maine scenery is a download. It isn't default at all and is high quality way above anything that comes as standard with either FS Stnadrad or Pro edition.

As I understand it you're not comparing apples with apples.

Also you can't go by screen shots put up by other people.

Fly has a reputation for HQ screenies  ;) whereas rifle's are always a bit messy..... ;D ;D Haaaaaa
RollerBall
 

Re: fs2002 standard/pro

Postby Donnie111 » Fri Jul 18, 2003 11:41 am

The textures in fs2k2st did look that way on my screen.
The Ring
The Place To Be!!!!!
User avatar
Donnie111
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2003 3:46 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: fs2002 standard/pro

Postby Scottler » Fri Jul 18, 2003 11:41 am

The Maine scenery is a download. It isn't default at all and is high quality way above anything that comes as standard with either FS Stnadrad or Pro edition.


You'd think that the original author would have the decency to mention such a major factor.
Great edit, Bob.


Google it.

www.google.com
Scottler
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5011
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Albany, New York USA

Re: fs2002 standard/pro

Postby RollerBall » Fri Jul 18, 2003 12:10 pm

[quote]Fly has a reputation for HQ screenies
RollerBall
 

Re: fs2002 standard/pro

Postby Donnie111 » Fri Jul 18, 2003 12:12 pm

I can send him an instand message (kidding)
The Ring
The Place To Be!!!!!
User avatar
Donnie111
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2003 3:46 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: fs2002 standard/pro

Postby fisharno » Fri Jul 18, 2003 12:21 pm

I'm not sure that's a good comparison.

Your first example is from Rifleman's machine, which he as listed as an 1.8Ghz machine, with 512Mb Ram.

Then the second example is from Fly2e's machine. He doesn't list his specs, but, he's had Ramsa do his magic, on his machine for him, and he is very, very good at extracting the best graphics performance out of any computer.

Apples and Oranges, my friend. I don't doubt that there's some differences in the two versions, but unless we were able to compare them both on similar  machines, (the same machine would be better), we can't get an accurate test. I only say this because I'm a Quality Engineer, in the real world, and do this type of thing for a living.

And, see.... Now, you've got my curiosity meter pegged!!  ;)
User avatar
fisharno
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 590
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 12:37 pm
Location: Reno, Nv

Re: fs2002 standard/pro

Postby Donnie111 » Fri Jul 18, 2003 12:24 pm

When I get fs2k2st back from my uncle i will make screenshot of both.
The Ring
The Place To Be!!!!!
User avatar
Donnie111
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2003 3:46 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: fs2002 standard/pro

Postby Scottler » Fri Jul 18, 2003 12:26 pm

This is sorta what I was saying when I said that few people have both programs.

In order to get accurate results in any test, you've got to account for all the variables.  They'd have to both be installed on the same system, and both screenies would have to be taken with the same programs running.  (In other words, you can't take one with no other programs on, and the other with anti-virus, roller coaster tycoon, internet explorer, and winamp playing in the background.  Also, you can't put a downloaded add-on scenery into one of the files...they'd have to be near identical screen shots!)

I'd be curious to see a comparison of THAT.  lol
Great edit, Bob.


Google it.

www.google.com
Scottler
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5011
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Albany, New York USA

Re: fs2002 standard/pro

Postby Donnie111 » Fri Jul 18, 2003 12:29 pm

I think its gonna take a while (my uncle lives far away), but i will do as you told. Your wish is my command!! ;D
The Ring
The Place To Be!!!!!
User avatar
Donnie111
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2003 3:46 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: fs2002 standard/pro

Postby Scottler » Fri Jul 18, 2003 12:32 pm

Nah, too much work, and you'll end up making some people extremely jealous, which will wind up making M$ even more money they don't need.  lol
Great edit, Bob.


Google it.

www.google.com
Scottler
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5011
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Albany, New York USA

Re: fs2002 standard/pro

Postby flyerorange » Fri Jul 18, 2003 12:51 pm

I think it's relative to your combo of settings, and the computer you're using, as far as the scenery.  You'd have to compare it with the exact same computer, with the same memory, and have identical settings.  

I have FS2002 Pro. For the past year , I have been using it on my Hp computer, which is 4 years old.  And I've loved it.  Last week, I installed it on my Dell, which is a year old, and has more memory.  What a difference!!  It's even better, and I can turn the settings up more, and not have performance affected.  The scenery is ten times better than on my HP.  

So I think you have to look at your memory situation, and your settings.
User avatar
flyerorange
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2002 10:14 am

Re: fs2002 standard/pro

Postby Paul2k12 » Fri Jul 18, 2003 12:53 pm

As I understand it:

FS2002 STD All the default aircraft except the caravan without floats, Mooney Bravo, King Air, But the standard edition hasn't got Gmax and the converting utility.

FS2002 PRO All the default aircarft including the above with Gmax but as far as I know there is no difference in scenery.

I use the standard edition as at the time it was all I could afford. Pleased to hear about FS2004 just having one edition  ;D

Paul2k10
Image
User avatar
Paul2k12
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 179
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 6:12 am
Location: Newcastle, United Kingdom

Re: fs2002 standard/pro

Postby Scottler » Fri Jul 18, 2003 12:58 pm

[quote]I think it's relative to your combo of settings, and the computer you're using, as far as the scenery.
Great edit, Bob.


Google it.

www.google.com
Scottler
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5011
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Albany, New York USA

Re: fs2002 standard/pro

Postby Donnie111 » Fri Jul 18, 2003 1:00 pm

Ive got the setting on max at all time. But the scenery isnt the same.
The Ring
The Place To Be!!!!!
User avatar
Donnie111
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2003 3:46 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: fs2002 standard/pro

Postby Donnie111 » Fri Jul 18, 2003 1:01 pm

Re:Nah, too much work, and you'll end up making some people extremely jealous, which will wind up making M$ even more money they don't need.  lol

I just give my money to M$ to let them create a better FS every time.lol
The Ring
The Place To Be!!!!!
User avatar
Donnie111
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2003 3:46 pm
Location: Netherlands

PreviousNext

Return to FS 2002

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 531 guests