FS 2002 OR 2004?

Flight Simulator 2002. Questions, suggestions, problems or solutions... aim here!

Re: FS 2002 OR 2004?

Postby commoner » Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:10 am

..mmm...NO CONTEST.....FS2004 wins hands down..commoner ;D
Last edited by commoner on Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is."
User avatar
commoner
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3221
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 2:26 am
Location: Yorkshire. England. UK.

Re: FS 2002 OR 2004?

Postby Straferr » Fri Feb 04, 2005 5:34 pm

About 2 and 1/2 years ago, I worked for a company that did experiments in electronics, based on the research done with superconductors back in the late sixties. One test involved CFS2 as a measuring stick. The PC was fed outside air in the middle of the winter in northern Minn. at 36 degrees below zero. The internal air in the case was monitored at an average of 11 below zero for the test. The hard drive [since it is sealed] ran very good. The CPU and solid state components ran wild. The best frame rate for CFS2 was 97 fps. When FS2002 came out, it was put to the test, with all sliders full tilt on a 2.6 gig cpu. The average frame rate in large metro areas was 68 fps. In the rural areas, it went as high as 84 fps. A lot has to do with the temperature of your machines.
Straferr
 

Previous

Return to FS 2002

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 374 guests