Page 1 of 1

Garfield on the oil crisis.....

PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:17 pm
by patchz
Image

[size=12][b]A lot of

Re: Garfield on the oil crisis.....

PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:29 pm
by B_7772
;D ;D ;D

Re: Garfield on the oil crisis.....

PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:55 am
by ozzy72
;D ;D ;D ;D

Re: Garfield on the oil crisis.....

PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 12:25 pm
by H
Slick... but, then, patchz has been located quite near our oil slicks. ;)


8-)

Re: Garfield on the oil crisis.....

PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:59 pm
by patchz
Slick... but, then, patchz has been located quite near our oil slicks. ;)


8-)

You're a lot closer to the dipsticks though. ::)

Re: Garfield on the oil crisis.....

PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 5:51 pm
by H
Slick... but, then, patchz has been located quite near our oil slicks. ;)

You're a lot closer to the dipsticks though. ::)
Not 'a lot' closer -- neither of us wants to walk the distance; however, you're still closer to where some of the more prominent ones came from... :)


8-)

Re: Garfield on the oil crisis.....

PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:21 pm
by patchz
Slick... but, then, patchz has been located quite near our oil slicks. ;)

You're a lot closer to the dipsticks though. ::)
Not 'a lot' closer -- neither of us wants to walk the distance; however, you're still closer to where some of the more prominent ones came from... :)


8-)

I was unaware any of them qualified for being described as prominent. ::)

Re: Garfield on the oil crisis.....

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:43 pm
by H
I was unaware any of them qualified for being described as prominent. ::)
Famous/infamous... in the news. Even Chicago is closer to you than to me. :D


8-)

Re: Garfield on the oil crisis.....

PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 6:00 am
by patchz
I was unaware any of them qualified for being described as prominent. ::)
Famous/infamous... in the news. Even Chicago is closer to you than to me. :D


8-)

You are correct, Chicago is closer to me, by 138 miles. But you said Washington was not a lot closer to you. D.C. is 428 miles from you, 835 miles from me, a difference of 407 miles.

I'd call that almost twice as close. In any event, it is not likely that either of us will bump into one of those infamous dipsticks.

And I, for one, am eternally grateful for that little tidbit.

Re: Garfield on the oil crisis.....

PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 5:07 pm
by H
are correct, Chicago is closer to me, by 138 miles. But you said Washington was not a lot closer to you. D.C. is 428 miles from you, 835 miles from me, a difference of 407 miles.
Washington is over 525 miles from me... don't push me closer than I need to be...  :D



8-)

Re: Garfield on the oil crisis.....

PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 8:43 am
by patchz
are correct, Chicago is closer to me, by 138 miles. But you said Washington was not a lot closer to you. D.C. is 428 miles from you, 835 miles from me, a difference of 407 miles.
Washington is over 525 miles from me... don't push me closer than I need to be...

Re: Garfield on the oil crisis.....

PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:23 pm
by H
We must be using different maps, or different rulers.
Or maybe you are measuring road miles, while I'm going as the crow flies. Just what Washington needs, more crows. ::)
[color=#003300]Just how in the world are you able to manage a flight on a crow?!? ;D

Re: Garfield on the oil crisis.....

PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 6:08 pm
by patchz
No self respecting turkey vulture will go anywhere near Washington. ::)

Re: Garfield on the oil crisis.....

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:53 pm
by Skunkworks
[color=#000000]Unless it were Russel Crowe, then there'd be another actor politician in Washington!
Very funny joke L.T.