Page 1 of 1

Your Society and Tax Dollars at Work

PostPosted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:49 pm
by Jeff.Guo
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Re: Your Society and Tax Dollars at Work

PostPosted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:57 pm
by B-Valvs
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Wow!

8-)

Re: Your Society and Tax Dollars at Work

PostPosted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 10:45 pm
by a1
2nd, 3rd, and last are just so classic. ;D ;D ;D

Re: Your Society and Tax Dollars at Work

PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 12:15 am
by specter177
I remember reading the fourth one, and I think it was about the Iraqi civil war, or something like that.

Re: Your Society and Tax Dollars at Work

PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 5:31 am
by ozzy72
Journalists, somewhere below plankton for intellectual capacity ;D

Re: Your Society and Tax Dollars at Work

PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 7:40 am
by DaveSims
That last one makes a lot of sense actually.

Re: Your Society and Tax Dollars at Work

PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:10 am
by Steve M
Poor old Dwight Emburger! (3rd one) Pasted on the internet for all to see, for eternity.  FAIL   ;D

Re: Your Society and Tax Dollars at Work

PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:20 am
by Jeff.Guo
That last one makes a lot of sense actually.


Please enlighten me, 2/40 women were female... ;D

Re: Your Society and Tax Dollars at Work

PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:22 am
by Hagar
That last one makes a lot of sense actually.


Please enlighten me, 2/40 women were female... ;D

I think he's insinuating that the gender of other 38 is doubtful. :D

Re: Your Society and Tax Dollars at Work

PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 5:55 pm
by Rich H
;D ;D ;D Great set.

Re: Your Society and Tax Dollars at Work

PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:37 pm
by Al_Fallujah
That last one makes a lot of sense actually.


Please enlighten me, 2/40 women were female... ;D

I think he's insinuating that the gender of other 38 is doubtful. :D


Or simply more manly than some male counterparts in the senate.

Re: Your Society and Tax Dollars at Work

PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:33 am
by Capt.Propwash
That last one makes a lot of sense actually.


Please enlighten me, 2/40 women were female... ;D

I think he's insinuating that the gender of other 38 is doubtful. :D


Or simply more manly than some male counterparts in the senate.



or maybe the other 38 women that were in the senate (chamber or building), were not actually senators.  thus, only 2 of the 40 were in the senate.