by Saitek » Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:38 am
Certainly if someone was dumb enough to make the law so dumb it is what an idiot would keep, there must a dozen dumb enough to carry it out.
EDIT: With regards to the first one - English law is made up from local byelaws (these can be dumb sometimes), acts of parliament and case law. So if someone did such an act then the judge may state in the case his ratio decidendi which is the binding precedent of law that other judges must follow and is a phrase that is legally binding. Judges have to be careful here, so he may have been very precise to allow room for future movement.

It would appear a little odd that sunset is mentioned at all or the need for the law as amongst several acts of parliament there is one in which it is illegal to "expose one's person on a public highway". Certainly if there is any chance of it being true it was not made by an act of parliament.
Last edited by
Saitek on Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Windows 7 Pro 64bit
Intel Core 2 Duo E2180 2GHz
GA-P35-DS3L Intel P35
Kingston HyperX 4GB (2x2) DDR2 6400C4 800Mhz
GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
2 x 22" monitors
200GB Sata
Be Quiet! Straight Power 650W
Flying FS