What a complete load of rubbish that article is. Just take the Comet for example. Far from being worst, after it initial flaws, it actually benefitted the aviation world tremedously.
What a complete load of rubbish that article is. Just take the Comet for example. Far from being worst, after it initial flaws, it actually benefitted the aviation world tremedously.
114 produced and 13 crashes. Not great, but for the first jet airliner, not a bad effort. Now for something a bit more modern, the 737 range is running at about 80 crashes (fatal) to date.
Matt
And if the DH design team had a crystal ball, and knew about the windows, that would have been a lot fewer.
Russia's Tupolev TU-144 was the first supersonic transport and the only commercial plane to exceed Mach 2
Are you saying that it's a good thing that naval diving bells weren't designed by aeronautical dumbbells?And if the DH design team had a crystal ball, and knew about the windows, that would have been a lot fewer.
I've always felt they should have known. They ignored basic engineering principles. Any engineer could have told them you don't use rectangular openings in a pressure vessel. There is more to this than was admitted at the time.
Yes, even the Comet, which was only flawed in that further testing should have been done before putting it into service, given the new ground they were breaking.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 873 guests