Page 1 of 1

Assualt Wha?!?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:42 am
by Dr.bob7
A guy here in colorado is charged of 3rd degree assualt for throwing a snowball at a co-worker (whitch was reportly "mostly ice")  he can get 6 months WTH????? are we living in a world where people cant get over anything?

Re: Assault Wha?!?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:03 am
by Fozzer
I love the American Legal system where, if you accidentally brush against someone at 1 MPH, with your motor-car/bicycle/scooter/etc you can be prosecuted for attacking them with a "Deadly Weapon"... :o...!

The Highway Police often use that as an excuse for sending an errant motorist to the Electric Chair!... :o...!

...time to move to another Country?... ::)...!

Paul... ;D...!

Edit: Assault.

Re: Assualt Wha?!?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:15 am
by BFMF
[quote]A guy here in colorado is charged of 3rd degree assualt for throwing a snowball at a co-worker (whitch was reportly "mostly ice")

Re: Assualt Wha?!?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:35 am
by pepper_airborne
Heh, its a bloody snowball, havent we all buried each other into snow as kids?

If it were possibly then you could sue god in the US.

Re: Assualt Wha?!?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:46 pm
by ozzy72
I think the US legal system is probably the silliest in the world ;D Mind you the British system isn't far behind for sheer daftness ::) ;D
Methinks we should put the world in a nice quiet room with rubber wallpaper until it feels better....

Re: Assualt Wha?!?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:51 pm
by expat
3rd degree, what did he get, freezer burn ::)

Matt

Re: Assualt Wha?!?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:03 pm
by Katahu
I recommend that we have everyone get a snowball and start throwing them at the first lawyer or prosecutor that recommended such an accusation.

All in favor, pick up a snow ball and say "Aye"!

Aye!!!

Re: Assualt Wha?!?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:09 pm
by ozzy72
Couldn't I just paint a brick white and chuck that at lawyers? ;D

Re: Assualt Wha?!?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:35 pm
by murjax
If it were possibly then you could sue god in the US.

Someone recently did just that.

Re: Assualt Wha?!?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:13 pm
by Fozzer
If it were possibly then you could sue god in the US.

Someone recently did just that.


I'd love to know who won?... :o...!

(I think they are on equal terms!)... ::)...?

Paul... ;D...!

Re: Assualt Wha?!?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:34 pm
by Celtman
If it were possibly then you could sue god in the US.

Someone recently did just that.



;D ;Dhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_Who_Sued_God ;D ;D

Wouldn't surprise me if it actually happened somewhere........ Stupid claim culture!

Regards,
Celtman 8-)

Re: Assualt Wha?!?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:38 pm
by Dr.bob7
There are some cases where the dumbest lawsuits/trials come from some are taken seriously others are dismissed this is the serious one, a good example of smart and dumb judges:


GOOD JUDGE: a while back a family who's kid broke a leg in a snowball fight with friends, JUDGE: his own fault dismissed

BAD JUDGE: a woman sued mazda for not having proper instructions on how to secure seatbelts, not sure if she won

Re: Assualt Wha?!?

PostPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 12:54 pm
by Chris_F
Heh, its a bloody snowball, havent we all buried each other into snow as kids?

If it were possibly then you could sue god in the US.

I don't know how things are in other countries, but here in the US our snowballs are largely blood free.  A snowball so soaked in the stuff as to be called a "bloody snowball" is just disgusting.  :)

And I'd bet you can sue God in the US, but good luck trying to collect.

Re: Assualt Wha?!?

PostPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:51 pm
by Saitek
It's a silly film and a dumb idea. Anyone with any knowledge of law knows that "an act of God" is simply a legal definition for explaining something that wasn't anyone's fault. An alternative would be "an act of mother nature". Back in the days when law was in a primitive state gods or God were the powers that were only believed in. I disagree with the article's immature stance that it could be a serious question, which IMO, shows ignorance.