Page 1 of 1

no for reds at 2012

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:12 pm
by john_uk

The world-famous Red Arrows have been banned from appearing at the 2012 London Olympics because they are deemed "too British".

Organisers of the event say that the Arrows military background might be "offensive" to other countries taking part in the Games. The display team have performed at more than 4000 events worldwide, but the Department of Culture, Media and Sport have deemed the display team "too militaristically British".

Red Arrows pilots were said to be "outraged", as they had hoped to put on a truly world class display for the Games, something which had never been seen before.

Being axed from a British-based event for being "too British" is an insult - the Arrows are a symbol of Britain. The Red Arrows have been excellent ambassadors for British overseas trade, as they display their British-built Hawk aircraft all over the world.

The Arrows performed a short flypast in 2005 when the winning bid was announced, but their flypast at the Games was to have been truly spectacular. It is to be hoped that common sense prevails If you disagree with this decision, sign the petition on the link below

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/RedArrows201 ... Arrows2012


got this of my clan forum, he didnt state where he got the article from but it has a petition to the PM attached so real enough for me.

please sign it! because its just PC gone way to far

Re: no for reds at 2012

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:15 pm
by MWISimmer
Old news, but just goes to show how lily livered and PC the British have become..

Makes my blood boil  >:(  >:(  >:(

Re: no for reds at 2012

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:45 pm
by Hagar
Of course, there's no guarantee that the Red Arrows will still be around in 2012.

Re: no for reds at 2012

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:00 pm
by Ashar
That's like banning the Blue Angel's because they were too religious or something... ::) ::)

Stupid IMO >:(

EDIT:
It's not true. The team leader has said so himself.

Just shows how rumours can escalate... ::)


Is that right? Woo...That's a relief 8-)

Re: no for reds at 2012

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:45 pm
by Tweek
It's not true. The team leader has said so himself.

Just shows how rumours can escalate... ::)

Re: no for reds at 2012

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:17 pm
by a1
WHAT!!!!!!!!?????????? :o >:(

Re: no for reds at 2012

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:27 am
by spitfire boy
It's not true. The team leader has said so himself.

Just shows how rumours can escalate... ::)


phew!

Looking at that link, that jonny provided, the response to the petition shows this whole hype to be incorrect.

I say again; phew! ;)

Re: no for reds at 2012

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:27 am
by john_uk
It's not true. The team leader has said so himself.

Just shows how rumours can escalate... ::)


good news :) still good to see so much support though

Re: no for reds at 2012

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:44 am
by murjax
Oh please, does this mean that the next time the Olympics come to America, they will ban air force jets from flying because they are "too American"? This is complete nonsence.  >:(

Re: no for reds at 2012

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:21 pm
by C
It's not true. The team leader has said so himself.

Just shows how rumours can escalate... ::)



This story was tabloid rubbish as Tweek pointed out - THE SUN (that well respected haven of journalistic excellence, accuracy and good taste) didn't have a decent story for one Sunday's News of the World. It's mildly frustrating that it keeps appearing all over the place. If you look at the first paragraph of the petition page you'll see there was a response from "No 10" on 27th September. ::)

The no 10 petitions website was a decent idea, spoilt by the number of petitions which are absolute rubbish... ::)

Re: no for reds at 2012

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:37 pm
by mrjake2002

This story was tabloid rubbish - THE SUN (that well respected haven of journalistic excellence, accuracy and good taste) didn't have a decent story for one Sunday's News of the World. It's mildly frustrating that it keeps appearing all over the place. If you look at the first paragraph of the petition page you'll see there was a response from "No 10" on 27th September. ::)


Just about to say the exact same thing Charlie.

Re: no for reds at 2012

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:30 pm
by Tweek
WHAT!!!!!!!!?????????? :o >:(


Oh please, does this mean that the next time the Olympics come to America, they will ban air force jets from flying because they are "too American"? This is complete nonsence.  >:(


It'd be nice if people would read the rest of the thread.

Re: no for reds at 2012

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 3:44 pm
by Mushroom_Farmer
Typical. If there are no news stories controversial enough to be worth printing, then make them up. ::)

Re: no for reds at 2012

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 3:43 am
by john_uk
Typical. If there are no news stories controversial enough to be worth printing, then make them up. ::)


journalism at its finest.