This Meets the Eye in Reverse
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:33 pmor, at least, did so with mine. When I read the title Eating Less Meat May Slow Climate Change my first thought was "That should heat up the atmosphere with the emissions of overpopulating herds." Turns out that the scientific consensus is the opposite, however, concluding that fewer would be raised. I guess this means that those alive would suicidally die from rejection before birthing offspring.
I'm not in contention with the diagnosis that eating meat increases cancer and circulatory risks. They also stated that eating less meat would decrease obesity, however. Personally, I 'm still fighting increases with my body fat and, for more than a decade, my red meat consumption has been rare, although I don't want to eat it at all if it's rare.
Perhaps the dinosaurs didn't die, at least directly, from an external disaster as presently thought. Rather, it was from intentional constipation -- to reduce global heat, they'd plugged their butts.
I'm not in contention with the diagnosis that eating meat increases cancer and circulatory risks. They also stated that eating less meat would decrease obesity, however. Personally, I 'm still fighting increases with my body fat and, for more than a decade, my red meat consumption has been rare, although I don't want to eat it at all if it's rare.
Perhaps the dinosaurs didn't die, at least directly, from an external disaster as presently thought. Rather, it was from intentional constipation -- to reduce global heat, they'd plugged their butts.
8-)
