After I posted that I saw this on the news. It makes my explanation worthless and shows that justice is gone from the courts and what I have learnt just isn't done.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manc ... 700494.stm
A lawyer. Diminished responsibility in slashing someone all over to death? Big joke.
A story this good should be true. Alas, it's not. There never was a suicidal Ronald Opus, a feuding, shotgun-wielding older couple, or an increasingly confused medical examiner trying to get to the bottom of things. But there is some truth to it, for there is a Don Harper Mills, and he did tell this very story at a meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences.
Here's how Mills explained his involvement with the story in a 1997 interview:
I made up the story in 1987 to present at the meeting, for entertainment and to illustrate how if you alter a few small facts you greatly alter the legal consequences. In 1994 someone copied it on to the Internet. I was told it had already garnered 200,000 enquiries on the Net. In the past two years I've had around 400 telephone calls about it - librarians, journalists, law students, even law professors wanting to incorporate it into text books.
It was hypothetical; just a story made up to illustrate a point. It's hard to imagine anyone at that 1987 meeting took it for anything else.
I have a friend who knows a guy who once ran a red light and broadsided a car. Unfortunantly, he didn't have any auto insurance.
But fortunantly, because the guy he hit had just robbed a convenience store, he was let off with a warning
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 539 guests