this could revoluntionize turnarounds at airports

If it doesn't fit .. It fits here .. - -

this could revoluntionize turnarounds at airports

Postby legoalex2000 » Sat Aug 06, 2005 2:42 pm

just read this at boeing.com's website after looking up something about the FBI tapping into phone lines and internet connections on airplanes.

story, well i'll let you read it. this WILL make turnarounds at airports 10x easier

http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/200 ... 0801a.html
legoalex2000
 

Re: this could revoluntionize turnarounds at airpo

Postby TacitBlue » Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:36 pm

I had this idea years ago. I figured that they had already tried something like this, so I never even thought about doing something with it.
Image
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y

Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
User avatar
TacitBlue
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3856
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 12:33 pm
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA

Re: this could revoluntionize turnarounds at airpo

Postby Craig. » Sat Aug 06, 2005 4:00 pm

sounds good in theory, but dont drop the tug just yet. What if it breaks? more delays more things to go wrong.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: this could revoluntionize turnarounds at airpo

Postby Hagar » Sat Aug 06, 2005 4:03 pm

sounds good in theory, but dont drop the tug just yet. What if it breaks? more delays more things to go wrong.

Indeed. I'm sure I've seen this idea demonstrated before. Maybe I dreamed it. ::)

PS. Come to think of it we discussed it here not so long ago. Maybe we should sue. ;)
Last edited by Hagar on Sat Aug 06, 2005 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: this could revoluntionize turnarounds at airpo

Postby beaky » Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:40 pm

I dunno about this clever idea... adds weight and complexity. I'll bet most ATPs would look at it as just another thing that might give them trouble...
Maybe they should revolutionize the tugs, instead: two sets of steerable wheels, improve the ease of latching to the aircraft, etc.
Besides, the greatest delay on the ground, in my experience, occurs in between pullout or pushback and the runway. Getting in and out of the gate is the least of it.
Then there's the one even the most clever will have trouble outwitting: the weather. ;D
Image
User avatar
beaky
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:00 am
Location: Shenandoah, PA USA

Re: this could revoluntionize turnarounds at airpo

Postby legoalex2000 » Sat Aug 06, 2005 9:08 pm

Besides, the greatest delay on the ground, in my experience, occurs in between pullout or pushback and the runway. Getting in and out of the gate is the least of it.
Then there's the one even the most clever will have trouble outwitting: the weather. ;D


and those passengers who dont get it about being "early" to get "on-time" to the plane.

although im not one to speak, becuase i missed my plane from KABQ-KORD on monday  ;) ;D

i think it's a great idea, but yes it probably means more mechanical what-not...

:)Ramos
legoalex2000
 

Re: this could revoluntionize turnarounds at airpo

Postby Triple_7 » Sat Aug 06, 2005 9:30 pm

Sounds like more things to go wrong and could cause more delays then they might expect.  I dont think I would want to know the extra onboard weight of an electric motor that could push and pull a fully loaded 747 around :P  If a tug has problems then there are more around to use...If an attached electric motor has problems then probably has to be fixed before the aircraft can get airborn causing longer delays :-/

How about an electric motor on the ground that is on some kind of track and could push the aircraft back into the position required.  Makes more sence and then you wont have the added weight to the aircraft ;)  Still...Problems can and always will arrise :-X
Triple_7
 

Re: this could revoluntionize turnarounds at airpo

Postby legoalex2000 » Sat Aug 06, 2005 11:58 pm

you guys make it sound like this motor is going to weigh as much as the aircraft itself. were talking a coulple hundred pounds, at most. just means us americans have to not eat that extra piece of cake  ::) ;D

it's still a good brainstorming idea. i dont think the track thing would work. imagine, if the motor breaks, a tug pulls it off to the side, if the guide breaks, you have a plane stuck on the taxiway hooked to the ground, blocking the way. also a good thought though.

:)Ramos
Last edited by legoalex2000 on Sat Aug 06, 2005 11:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
legoalex2000
 

Re: this could revoluntionize turnarounds at airpo

Postby Jared » Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:15 pm

Wot? Can't have our cake and eat it too?  :(
User avatar
Jared
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 9976
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Uniontown, Ohio


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 417 guests