Page 1 of 1

Attention SBC Yahoo users!

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:15 pm
by Jared
Ever since I upgraded aol to 9.0 I have had a program on my computer that would run every time I would start up.  So finally isntead of studying for a test that I have to take tomorrow I figured I would do some research on this particular spyware program, and figure out how to get rid of it...

popped into my new SBC DSL homepage typed the name of the program and SBC gave me a standard spyware prevention page...

Anyways, I click on the link to see what they recommend and SBC Yahoo actually has a spyware prevention program which basically removes all spyware! :-)

Installed it, and now it runs everytime I log-in to my dsl account in the background for a second or two...

But best of all it removed that blessed file! ;-)

So I figured that I would let anybody who's using SBC Yahoo know that this type of program exists and does work (so far so good anyway..;-))

Re: Attention SBC Yahoo users!

PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 8:21 am
by chomp_rock
You use AOL?! I feel bad for you, the new "anti spyware software" in AOL is known to be easy for spyware to get through.

Re: Attention SBC Yahoo users!

PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:50 am
by Jared
Actually now I use SBC DSL Yahoo service.. :-)

Works a whole lot better than AOL! :-)

Re: Attention SBC Yahoo users!

PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 10:04 am
by Fozzer
Actually now I use SBC DSL Yahoo service.. :-)

Works a whole lot better than AOL! :-)


Does anyone still use "AOL" as a service provider... ;)...?

...answers on the back of a postage stamp... ::)...!

LOL...LOL...LOL... ;D...!

Cheers all... 8)...!

Paul.

Re: Attention SBC Yahoo users!

PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 12:03 pm
by chomp_rock
I thought you meant that you still used AOL in this sentence:
Ever since I upgraded aol to 9.0 I have had a program on my computer that would run every time I would start up.

I guess I misinterpreted it ::).

Re: Attention SBC Yahoo users!

PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 12:50 pm
by Jared
That's quite ok, I wasn't very clear in my original post... ;-)