pretty much. i believe its the steady stream of bullets. and 1 tracer bullet for every 13 bullets fired(not sure on tha going on news report) still a pretty effective method to take out low flying aircraft and even cruise missiles which dont have very effective methods to avoid that sort of fire
AA and AAA are still in use pretty much evrey where, NATO ships carry the Phalanx CIWS (basically a Vulcan I think), then theres ZSUs as well. Guns and ammo are relativly cheap compared to SAMs and can be highly effective against low flying or slow aircraft. Also flack can't be countered unless you see it comming up.
If someone with multiple personality disorder threatens suicide, is it a hostage situation?
Thou shalt maintain thine airspeed lest the ground shalt rise up and smite thee
Interesting... Is there a good source where I could find out more information, but without it assuming I practically have a copy of the thing's blueprints on hand?
Would have thought that these days, at least some of the AAA would be Radar controlled or similar. I know there was technology of this kind towards the end of WWII.
As for the manually operated AAA, you can get lucky. A number of US jet aircraft were brought down in Vietnam by small arms fire. ;D
Brensec is right. The germans were using both radar target aquisition and fire control by 1944. Then we started jamming it, RAF bomber command losses were reduced as a direct result.