My three cents on the "newbie" dilemma

The posts, by now, are very obvious and are still turning up.
It has been properly suggested that we be good to any newbies here and not jump to conclusions. Whereas that's good policy, therein also lies the rub. Who defines as a legit newbie, and who defines as a one-time spammer? We don't want to discourage new people here, but do we need off-aviation "questions" that the questioner posts and never gets back to? Most newbies participate here. This guy does not. We can "Suspect everyone, and suspect no one" at the same time.
My suggestion: Plan A: I think the mods should go after any suspicious looking newbies (I've spotted every one of them, you all have also), and flat out ask them to introduce themselves, stating why they should introduce themselves, if they don't respond, delete the posts.
Plan B: Wait until, say, the end of the month and see if they stop. That way we give us time to more fully judge this situation. If they keep showing up, invoke Plan A.
These guys (I suspect it's the same person) are asking questions. It's only logical to assume they want an answer. So far, not even as much as a "Thanks." I haven't seen any responses from them.
OK, I've got a question for the poster(s): Why are you asking US, an aviation community, questions about CAD software, Javascript, etc.? Sure, someone here knows, but we're really not the place for this sort of question. If you're reading this, speak up and properly introduce yourself.
How do you discourage graffiti? You paint over it right away. If we delete these recent posts and quickly delete any new ones (all of them are easily identified), maybe, just maybe, they'll stop. It's my guess that whoever, if not responding, is watching his posts anyway. Does not an artist look at his/her paintings after they're done?
It has been properly suggested that we be good to any newbies here and not jump to conclusions. Whereas that's good policy, therein also lies the rub. Who defines as a legit newbie, and who defines as a one-time spammer? We don't want to discourage new people here, but do we need off-aviation "questions" that the questioner posts and never gets back to? Most newbies participate here. This guy does not. We can "Suspect everyone, and suspect no one" at the same time.
My suggestion: Plan A: I think the mods should go after any suspicious looking newbies (I've spotted every one of them, you all have also), and flat out ask them to introduce themselves, stating why they should introduce themselves, if they don't respond, delete the posts.
Plan B: Wait until, say, the end of the month and see if they stop. That way we give us time to more fully judge this situation. If they keep showing up, invoke Plan A.
These guys (I suspect it's the same person) are asking questions. It's only logical to assume they want an answer. So far, not even as much as a "Thanks." I haven't seen any responses from them.
OK, I've got a question for the poster(s): Why are you asking US, an aviation community, questions about CAD software, Javascript, etc.? Sure, someone here knows, but we're really not the place for this sort of question. If you're reading this, speak up and properly introduce yourself.
How do you discourage graffiti? You paint over it right away. If we delete these recent posts and quickly delete any new ones (all of them are easily identified), maybe, just maybe, they'll stop. It's my guess that whoever, if not responding, is watching his posts anyway. Does not an artist look at his/her paintings after they're done?