Page 1 of 1

Back to the Jeep (General Purpose Vehicle)

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:42 am
by OldAirmail
Boeing's Phantom Badger packs a lot of combat vehicle into a small package

The GP/Jeep was developed by Willys as a light weight, cross-country reconnaissance/utility vehicle.

It did what it was supposed to do, but decades later the military wanted something better.


Along comes the Humvee.

Well, the Humvee gets used in combat areas (as was the original GP/Jeep) and soldiers get killed, as sometimes happened in a combat area.

The people rose up, and cried out "Our soldiers are getting killed! Why is this vehicle not protecting them!"


People were getting killed while ridding in it because it was an Unarmored General Purpose Vehicle, NOT an APC (Armoured personnel carrier)

So the public demanded an armored general purpose vehicle. Add an extra 1,500 to 2,200 pounds (680 to 1,000 kg) to the vehicle.

Now we don't have a "light weight GP utility vehicle".



Breaking news - We need a "light weight utility vehicle".

Boeing's Phantom Badger packs a lot of combat vehicle into a small package

Ignore the add-ons. This is the "new" GP/Jeep.
Image

Image

Around and around.

Re: Back to the Jeep (General Purpose Vehicle)

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:58 am
by PhantomTweak
Badger, badger, badger, badger, badger... :lol: :lol:


Pat☺

Re: Back to the Jeep (General Purpose Vehicle)

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:07 am
by OldAirmail
HEY! Don't you badger ME!!! :evil:

It's got YOUR name all over it. :lol:

Re: Back to the Jeep (General Purpose Vehicle)

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 12:05 pm
by PhantomTweak
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Yeah, for some reason the civilian contractors for the military seem to love the word "Phantom" . They stick it to evry thing! Even us lowly tweaks!
If I could figure out a decent solvent, I'd use it.... :lol: :lol: :dance:

Pat☺

Re: Back to the Jeep (General Purpose Vehicle)

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 1:52 pm
by Fozzer
I bet that engine in the "new" Jeep is a lot more complicated than the original, simple, cheap 'n cheerful, petrol, 4-cycilinder, side-valve engine!...>>> Image

You cant beat "simplicity" when it come to break-downs in the middle of nowhere!

Paul....Petrol-head... :D ...!

Re: Back to the Jeep (General Purpose Vehicle)

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:03 pm
by Hawkeye07
"You cant beat "simplicity" when it come to break-downs in the middle of nowhere!"

Or when you're getting shot at! :o

Re: Back to the Jeep (General Purpose Vehicle)

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:26 pm
by PhantomTweak
No doubt, when the bullets fly and the pucker factor rises through the roof, knowing that when you hit "start" and try to put your gas pedal through the floor, the engine will be more than happy to go "VROOM!!" :lol: <<s

Simple does it, complicated....not so much!

Always remember...
* Afterburners aren’t.
* Air Brakes don’t.
* Friendly fire – isn’t.
* Suppressive fires – won’t.



Pat☺

Re: Back to the Jeep (General Purpose Vehicle)

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:09 am
by Fozzer
I can remember all my old Motor Car engines, with their push-rod, overhead valves, normally aspirated carburettors, high-tension spark distributors, electric dynamos, clicking voltage regulators, mechanical/electric diaphragm petrol pumps, etc, were all "fixable" on the side of the road, if they broke-down!
Not the same nowadays, with non-fixable, fuel injection, electronic ignition, and complex Engine Control Systems....

...any problems with any that fancy stuff, in the middle of nowhere, (Death Valley?) and you are in REAL trouble!.... :shock: ....!

Paul...a leaky carburettor you CAN fix!..... :mrgreen: ...!