Thunderbolt Squadron Question

If it doesn't fit .. It fits here .. - -

Re: Thunderbolt Squadron Question

Postby Sock » Sat Oct 04, 2003 9:03 pm

[quote]
User avatar
Sock
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1623
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:50 pm
Location: Hudson, NY USA

Re: Thunderbolt Squadron Question

Postby denishc » Sat Oct 04, 2003 9:30 pm

 Interesting note on the P-47M, from what I've read, those that were camouflaged were not painted in standard Air Corps colors.  Supposedly the camo paint came from a British auto shop, which gave the M models unique hues of blue and violet.  
denishc
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 5:01 pm

Re: Thunderbolt Squadron Question

Postby Professor Brensec » Sat Oct 04, 2003 9:41 pm

Hawk, I know many pilots liked their P51B's. many Australian pilots refused 'point blank' to get out of them. They didn't need the far increased range of the D model in the South Western Pacific and I think most had the 6 x gun upgrade done, so they really didn't want them.
Most of you probably know that my favourite mount is the P51-B (as oppsed to my favourite looker - the P40).........lol ;D

Back to the P47. I see al the reasons for the Razors still being around and the fact that some may have preferred that plane etc etc. But my initial quandry was about the fact that this particular film continually shows that ratio of 1 x razor with 3 x bubbles. I was wondering if there was a specific reason for that 'constant'...........configuration in flights.  ;D ;)
Image
Image
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz


I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.
User avatar
Professor Brensec
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 10:40 pm
Location: SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Re: Thunderbolt Squadron Question

Postby Sock » Sat Oct 04, 2003 10:12 pm

[quote]
User avatar
Sock
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1623
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:50 pm
Location: Hudson, NY USA

Re: Thunderbolt Squadron Question

Postby fido » Sun Oct 05, 2003 10:32 am

  Hey, if we are all just speculating, could it be the the groups in question were hoping the Germans would only see the bare metal Jugs and miss the olive drab one, leading to a supprise for the Hun.  At some point in the war weren't we trying to bait the Germans into a fight of attrition?  Just a thought. ???

              Fido
A day at the office for my Dad (Ie Shima 1945)
[img]
http://simviation.com/yabbuploads/Copy of DRAGONANDHISTAIL1SIMV.jpg[/img]

May the sun be always at your six o'clock.
User avatar
fido
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 6:49 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: Thunderbolt Squadron Question

Postby Hagar » Sun Oct 05, 2003 11:27 am

I haven't seen this doco (wish I had) & know far too little about the P-47. I do know it's a mighty impressive looking machine.

From what Brensec is saying, this particular squadron were involved in ground support. I would assume they had adequate air cover & not expect to be in air to air combat. This is only a theory but maybe they used every aircraft they could get hold of. The razorbacks might then be equally distributed between flights. It sounds as good as any other theory to me unless anyone knows better. ::)
Last edited by Hagar on Sun Oct 05, 2003 11:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30862
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Thunderbolt Squadron Question

Postby HawkerTempest5 » Sun Oct 05, 2003 4:42 pm

US 9th and British Second TAF were heavily engaged in ground support after D-Day and put just about everything they had to use, not just Typhoons and Jugs but Spits, Mustangs and P-38's also. A Razor would be just as effective in this roll as a Bubble and I really just think it was a case of "we've got 'em, so let's use 'em!"
Image
Flying Legends
User avatar
HawkerTempest5
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2883
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 3:09 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Thunderbolt Squadron Question

Postby Sock » Sun Oct 05, 2003 7:26 pm

I haven't seen this doco (wish I had) & know far too little about the P-47. I do know it's a mighty impressive looking machine.

From what Brensec is saying, this particular squadron were involved in ground support. I would assume they had adequate air cover & not expect to be in air to air combat. This is only a theory but maybe they used every aircraft they could get hold of. The razorbacks might then be equally distributed between flights. It sounds as good as any other theory to me unless anyone knows better. ::)


9th AF P-47s rarly had air cover.  And all USAAF figther pilots, regardless of role, were taught as fighter pilots to fly air-to-air missions.  Pilots were not taught much ground support tactics.  Many fighter-bomber pilots had kills to there credit.

Sock
User avatar
Sock
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1623
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:50 pm
Location: Hudson, NY USA

Re: Thunderbolt Squadron Question

Postby Professor Brensec » Sun Oct 05, 2003 9:44 pm

This Doco, although it is based around footage of a film commissioned by the USAAF in '44, has completely recent commentary and interviews. So none of the original info, that was part of the film, is not heard.

There is footage of the P47s engaing and shooting down, mainly what appear to be Fw190's. You dont see any 262's and the only Me109 I recall seeing in on the ground, desrtroyed.
Most of the 'gun camera' or 'cockpit' footage is of ground attacks on airfields, towns, vehicles, trains and unfortunately, quite a number of 'horse drawn' ammo wagons. (These poor horses). One pilot describes the road as being "Painted red with blood" after such an attack. :'(

Anyway, it would seem the 1 in 4 arrangement is a mystery. I personally feel that they were just evenly distirbuted among the flights, maybe because of their one shortcoming, the poor visibilty. Or maybe just a bit of 'uniformity'. I dunno.  ;D ;)

P.S. This is the Doco where I first heard of the method they used to 'kill' Tigers, by bouncing the .50 cal rounds off the road up underneath into the 'unarmoured' belly of the tank. One Pilot (Vet 'guest') describes this process in relative detail. It was apparently quite effective.  ;D ;)
Image
Image
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz


I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.
User avatar
Professor Brensec
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 10:40 pm
Location: SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Re: Thunderbolt Squadron Question

Postby Professor Brensec » Sun Oct 05, 2003 9:59 pm

Towards the end of the Doco, there is an account of the situation regarding the 100's of thousands of German soldiers that had to walk back to Germany when the War was over.
There is some footage of these often pathetic looking convoys of Germans walking down a road, with the odd American or Brit, who has no rifle pointed or at the ready, just over the shoulder etc.

The amazing thing, to me at least, is that there are clearly what appear to be SS Officers, in full garb, happily chatting to GI's, and laughing etc.

How could this have been? They are Waffen SS, who I'm led to believe were just fighting soldiers and not involved in the atrocities etc. (However, I have seen other Doco's that have poked a few holes in this 'fact').

Even so, after having liberated the Death camps, how could these GI's etc be so ready to just forget and treat the blokes as anything other than animals. Surely the 'very obvious' skull and cross bones on the cap would be enough for them to realise who and what these blokes were. Many of the Wermacht hated them and what they knew they had done.

Maybe I'm being too harsh. maybe I'm assuming that every GI and Brit and Frenchman etc was aware, and had seen first hand, the work of the people. Maybe it was known then that the Waffen SS were not involved in this stuff? I dunno. I just saw it as..........surprising.  ;D ;)

It is strange to see on a couple of occasions, a truck or car (loaed with, what appear to be relatively healthy Germans) go passed a legless or obvious badly wounded German, hoobling down the road.......................What a terrible time, when even the slightest degree of human decency seems to have gone out the window. :'(
Image
Image
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz


I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.
User avatar
Professor Brensec
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 10:40 pm
Location: SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 129 guests