by jordonj » Wed Mar 30, 2005 5:48 pm
Here's a perspective from a different angle...
Suppose a young girl (18-20) needs a set of lungs, and a spinal cord injury victim just came in. The spinal cord victim is middle-aged (38-40) but has a good set of lungs. The spinal cord victim was injured high enough that it's unlikely that he'll survive much longer...but you only have a few hours before the young girl will pass the point of no return (where surgery will kill her).
Or suppose you have an elderly patient on a heart regulator who wants the machine turned off. His/her rationale: "If I get better what do I have to look ahead to? Going back to the nursing home? It smells bad, the food is lousy, and it's depressing...I don't wanna go back there."
My point is that ending treatment that keeps people alive artificially is a complicated issue and anyone who thinks it is simple (in my opinion) is fooling themselves.
My first flight in a 172 on August 20, 2004

Doing the right thing is more important than doing the thing right. (P. Drucker)
When all think alike, then no one i