Ahhhhhh Yeahhhhhh! It flies at mach 6!

If it doesn't fit .. It fits here .. - -

Re: Ahhhhhh Yeahhhhhh! It flies at mach 6!

Postby ATI_7500 » Sun Mar 28, 2004 5:26 am

I've heard of the HOTOL before,but I haven't thought that it would have been that effective...


Yes,the SR-71 is a masterpiece of engineering,especially if you consider that this aircraft is from the early 1960s.
ATI_7500
 

Re: Ahhhhhh Yeahhhhhh! It flies at mach 6!

Postby Hagar » Sun Mar 28, 2004 7:09 am

Yes, I can see why you are leary Hagar. That idea of HOTOL is gay. :o :-/

Maybe now you can understand what I'm getting at. Given the necessary funding I have no doubts that HOTOL would have worked & might yet do so. It seems to me that the 2 concepts are very similar with exactly the same problems. The only difference is the method of propulsion. You are still faced with boosting the thing up to the correct speed before the motor will run.

HOTOL would have taken off from a normal runway, like an aircraft. A rocket powered "sled" would accelerate it to take-off and then to several times the speed of sound. At this point, the sled would parachute back, and the RB454 would take over, extracting the air's oxygen to burn.

In scramjets, oxygen is rammed into a combustion chamber where it mixes with fuel and spontaneously ignites. To work, the engine must be traveling at about five times the speed of sound - requiring an initial boost that only a rocket can provide.


Even if this is possible in a single airframe it doesn't seem practical to me. It might be suitable for military use but I can't think of anywhere a civil version could be operated from except vast uninhabited areas like a desert. People seem obsessed with the idea of supersonic travel but forget the practical aspects. Concorde proved that this is a highly expensive method of travel which only the very wealthy minority could afford. The time involved in travelling to the airport, passing through customs/security checks & travelling to your destination at the other end often took longer than the actual flight. Rocket motors are extremely noisy. Even with conventional gas turbines Concorde was limited to where it could operate from & for this reason never reached its full potential.
Last edited by Hagar on Sun Mar 28, 2004 7:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Ahhhhhh Yeahhhhhh! It flies at mach 6!

Postby Craig. » Sun Mar 28, 2004 7:14 am

well untill the shockwave from breaking the sound barrier is surpressed they cant travel over populated areas anyway
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: Ahhhhhh Yeahhhhhh! It flies at mach 6!

Postby IcedFoxtrotter » Sun Mar 28, 2004 1:30 pm

It isnt intended for use around populated areas.
[move][i]A.L. Quote: Everytime you go away, it actually kinda makes my day. Everytime you leave you slam the door. You pick your words so carefully, you hate to think you're hurting me. You leave me laughing on the floor......Cause I don't give
User avatar
IcedFoxtrotter
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 460
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: N.W. American Rockies

Re: Ahhhhhh Yeahhhhhh! It flies at mach 6!

Postby Woodlouse2002 » Sun Mar 28, 2004 3:20 pm

It isnt intended for use around populated areas.

Right then, so when it becomes feasable it will not be for civil use and any military aircraft won't be allowed near any inhabitated areas of the world. A most fabulously useful piece of kit.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!

Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains c
User avatar
Woodlouse2002
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10369
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:51 pm
Location: Cornwall, England

Re: Ahhhhhh Yeahhhhhh! It flies at mach 6!

Postby IcedFoxtrotter » Sun Mar 28, 2004 3:38 pm

Right then, so when it becomes feasable it will not be for civil use and any military aircraft won't be allowed near any inhabitated areas of the world. A most fabulously useful piece of kit.

Remember the military is exempt when they need to?
[move][i]A.L. Quote: Everytime you go away, it actually kinda makes my day. Everytime you leave you slam the door. You pick your words so carefully, you hate to think you're hurting me. You leave me laughing on the floor......Cause I don't give
User avatar
IcedFoxtrotter
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 460
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: N.W. American Rockies

Re: Ahhhhhh Yeahhhhhh! It flies at mach 6!

Postby Woodlouse2002 » Sun Mar 28, 2004 3:47 pm

Remember the military is exempt when they need to?

Yes. But when they "need" to is when the country is under attack. So all these fighters and bombers won't be able to take off from the factory intill someone tries to invade the united states. Just remember that the inhabitants of America won't want all their windows smashed just because G.W wants to bomb a few caves on the other side of the planet.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!

Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains c
User avatar
Woodlouse2002
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10369
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:51 pm
Location: Cornwall, England

Re: Ahhhhhh Yeahhhhhh! It flies at mach 6!

Postby RitterKreuz » Sun Mar 28, 2004 4:09 pm

The plan would be to load the aircraft onto the back of a 747 "shuttle piggy back" style and fly them to remote bases in the south pacific for operational testing.
RitterKreuz
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1215
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 3:26 am
Location: Texas

Re: Ahhhhhh Yeahhhhhh! It flies at mach 6!

Postby ATI_7500 » Mon Mar 29, 2004 10:29 am

By the way...your nick is spelled wrongly. It's "Ritterkreuz",not "Ritterkruez". ::) ;)
ATI_7500
 

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 506 guests