Q for any CFI regarding non-powered approaches.

Ask questions about flying techniques here. Real or Simulated - the principles are the same!

Q for any CFI regarding non-powered approaches.

Postby Grant06 » Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:01 pm

After 13 years of regular powered approaches, throttle for altitude/ pitch for airspeed, I came accross the subject off non-powered approaches being safer as you don't have to worry about a power failure when on an approach. Currently been practicing this by just coming in fast, using gear, flaps and sideslipping to controll my desceleration. Is there more to this, or is it simply all about placing the runway in your windscreen in the right spot when you power down/idle.
How would a CFI tech this method of approach.
TY.
Paul.
...looking for something to work on today.
Grant06
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 11:01 am

Re: Q for any CFI regarding non-powered approaches.

Postby Brett_Henderson » Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:32 pm

You've got a good understanding of it..

The only "tools" I'd add, are the understanding that V-best-glide (for whatever your configuration) will obviously eat up the most ground, so obviously, any deviations (up or down) from that speed will steepen the approach...

Example.. coming in high, you could pitch for near Vmc (minumum controlable airspeed) and steepen the approach considerably.... OR .. Pitching for the highest airspeed availble (top of the white-arc when flaps are deployed), will steepen it too.

I prefer the latter, as hovering near stall-speed less than 1000agl makes me queasy (almost as queasy as slipping turns to final) , a significant wind-shift can erase your margin for error.
Last edited by Brett_Henderson on Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Brett_Henderson
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:09 am

Re: Q for any CFI regarding non-powered approaches.

Postby Grant06 » Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:56 pm

Yes, I was thinking V plus 10kts on final with only 10 flaps (C182RG). Figuring you can always slow down if you have more flaps on hand, along with slipping.
Just wondering also, about dumping flaps just before the flare.
ty
Grant06
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 11:01 am

Re: Q for any CFI regarding non-powered approaches.

Postby Brett_Henderson » Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:14 am

Yes, I was thinking V plus 10kts on final with only 10 flaps (C182RG). Figuring you can always slow down if you have more flaps on hand, along with slipping.
Just wondering also, about dumping flaps just before the flare.
ty


You'll get into a problem spot when you mix slipping and flaps.. depending on the airplane, of course.

While going against pulblished recomendations.. you can surely slip during a steep approach with flaps deployed.. we've all done it.. but the perils of my afformetioned wind-ship, become catastrophic. A high-winged airplane with flaps deployed is already "blanketing" the elevator.. a wind-shift at that time can render it utterly useless  :o

As for dumping the flaps just before a flare ? That depends on your experience-level, and confidence. If you wanna be brass-tacky about it.. a landing that would have you doing that, was a go-around before you got to that point.  ;)
Brett_Henderson
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:09 am

Re: Q for any CFI regarding non-powered approaches.

Postby Grant06 » Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:28 am

Yes, I was thinking V plus 10kts on final with only 10 flaps (C182RG). Figuring you can always slow down if you have more flaps on hand, along with slipping.
Just wondering also, about dumping flaps just before the flare.
ty


You'll get into a problem spot when you mix slipping and flaps.. depending on the airplane, of course.

While going against pulblished recomendations.. you can surely slip during a steep approach with flaps deployed.. we've all done it.. but the perils of my afformetioned wind-ship, become catastrophic. A high-winged airplane with flaps deployed is already "blanketing" the elevator.. a wind-shift at that time can render it utterly useless
Grant06
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 11:01 am

Re: Q for any CFI regarding non-powered approaches.

Postby beaky » Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:30 am

Not a CFI, but I am a pilot who prefers to begin my final descent at a point and airspeed which will allow me to glide to my intended touchdown point without power if need be. To be honest, I tend to come in a bit high at first, but with flaps, spoilers, or slipping, one can steepen the approach without exceeding the desired airspeed or descent rate.

Of course, such "tricks" should not be necessary, if you know the glide characteristics of the plane and have a good idea what the wind is up to.

And in the end, landing a bit long or having to go around is better than risking coming up short... as my glider guru says: "Better to roll into the trees beyond the runway at 10 mph than to crash into the trees before the runway at 50 mph."   ;D


Granted, this is not an option with some aircraft, but in, say, a 182, every time you "drag it in" you are asking for trouble. Even a slight loss of power could make all the difference in such shallow approaches.

I see pilots doing this all the time- I guess they were taught to maintain a certain throttle/prop setting during final, so they come in shallow to stay at or below the target airspeed. That shouldn't be necessary in any plane that will glide 1 mile from 500-1000 AGL (which is most of them). Not surprisingly, the pilots I know who fly gliders do not seem to do this, even when they are flying twins or other aircraft that have fairly high approach speeds. But you don't need glider time to figure out how to do this, nor do you need to extrapolate any customized formulas from the POH... you just need to experiment and note the results.
Image
User avatar
beaky
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:00 am
Location: Shenandoah, PA USA

Re: Q for any CFI regarding non-powered approaches.

Postby Splinter562 » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:56 am

Good practice for this technique is the "Power Off 180" which is a maneuver for the commercial pilot practical. The basic goal is to make a spot landing when pulling the power abeam the touchdown point.

You have several tools at your disposal to tune your glide:
  • Time the base turn to compensate for wind.
  • Delay flap extension on base to compensate if low.
  • Cheat the base leg in or out to compensate for glide errors.
  • Cut the corner of the final turn if low. Overshoot the center-line by a little bit if high.
  • Delay flap extension on final to compensate for being low.

Like beaky said,
User avatar
Splinter562
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 219
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:56 am
Location: Tampa, FL

Re: Q for any CFI regarding non-powered approaches.

Postby Grant06 » Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:41 pm

[quote]Good practice for this technique is the "Power Off 180" which is a maneuver for the commercial pilot practical. The basic goal is to make a spot landing when pulling the power abeam the touchdown point.

You have several tools at your disposal to tune your glide:
  • Time the base turn to compensate for wind.
  • Delay flap extension on base to compensate if low.
  • Cheat the base leg in or out to compensate for glide errors.
  • Cut the corner of the final turn if low. Overshoot the center-line by a little bit if high.
  • Delay flap extension on final to compensate for being low.

Like beaky said,
Grant06
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 11:01 am

Re: Q for any CFI regarding non-powered approaches.

Postby Chris E » Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:16 am

Not a CFI here, but just passed the commercial single engine checkride at a school that emphasizes power off 180 approaches.  Only bit to really add is that it does come with the danger of unexpected turbulence, wind changes, especially wind shear, and so on and so forth.  Each of these may force you to add power.  So use caution while attempting these approaches.  They can be quite fun though and if you do the power off 180 style approaches can really improve your landing accuracy in general.
Commercial MEL/SEL

ERAU Prescott Aerospace Engineering
Flight Minor
Chris E
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Q for any CFI regarding non-powered approaches.

Postby EVVFCX » Wed Apr 13, 2011 6:40 am

I try to base things loosely to when i was doing a lot of gliding.

Assume you have no guide to what your height should be: In the glider we were taught to try and get you final height such that you do your finals on half spoiler/airbrake, that way if you were slightly out or have wind shear you could retract spoiler and extend the glide and vice verse put more out if you were heading
Last edited by EVVFCX on Wed Apr 13, 2011 6:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
May the Mynd be with you.
So far my number of landings either passenger or pilot equal my number of takeoffs.

FSX Gold Acc, P3D V4, FS2020
User avatar
EVVFCX
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 751
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:32 am
Location: Pontefract, West Yorkshire


Return to Flight School

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 437 guests