Single/double pilot planes

[chornedsnorkack]

What are the biggest planes that are deliberately flown by one pilot?

All airliners can, in emergency, be landed by one pilot and it is acceptable for one pilot to leave the cockpit sometimes in cruise, like for lavatory visits. But they are not supposed to be deliberately flown with one pilot. And neither are big business jets.

Cessna, however, has a fair number of jets which can be flown by single pilot. Those are planes with two pilot seats in cockpit. Some of those Cessnas can be deliberately flown with one pilot seats empty. Other Cessnas, often versions of the same models, are not to be deliberately flown solo.

What is the difference in cockpit between Cessnas which can deliberately be flown solo and those which may not deliberately flown solo?

Also, I hear that a plenty of manufacturers are coming out of woodwork to manufacture Very Light Jets, with two pilot seats but supposed to be flown alone. Many of those manufacturers are previously unheard of. Some are not. For example, Embraer Phenom 100 is supposed to be flown solo. Embraer also manufactures other planes - including airlines.

What exactly makes those pressurized, high-speed, high altitude twin turbofans so easy to fly that it can be done alone?

Also, the flight simulators want to fly their flight simulators alone from one computer screen. How do they modify the cockpit layout for this? Do they do it in a manner similar to how light solo pilot plane versions are designed?

[C]

Just about any aircraft could be flown alone. The idea of having two crew though distributes the work load of flying, managing the systems, communications and in the worst case, dealing with emergencies...

The largest I think I've heard of being flown "solo" would be the BAC 1-11, although that may have been with another (non pilot) in the cockpit...

[chornedsnorkack]

Just about any aircraft could be flown alone.

I think the FAR-s require than the aircraft having more than one flightcrew members should remain flyable with any one member incapacitated.

It does not seem to require that aircrafts with more than two flightcrew members should remain flyable with two members incapacitated, though.

The idea of having two crew though distributes the work load of flying, managing the systems, communications and in the worst case, dealing with emergencies...

Would having three crew help with distributing the workload? What is the difference in the workload on planes that have just two pilots and workload on planes (often versions of same planes, like old Airbus 300, Boeing 767 or 747) that require a flight engineer?

[C]

Would having three crew help with distributing the workload? What is the difference in the workload on planes that have just two pilots and workload on planes (often versions of same planes, like old Airbus 300, Boeing 767 or 747) that require a flight engineer?

Basically yes, however on newer aircraft with more computer based "system management" systems, which in itself can present data on demend to the crew, identify area of concern etc, so the need for a third member of the crew has subsided, and with it the need to pay a third salary to a member of the flight deck crew...

[Brett_Henderson]

Work load is relative.. For example, we'll compare two IFR certified Cessna 172s:

Plane A: One Nav radio/single VOR/ILS head. One Communications radio and a transponder.

Plane B: Two, flip-flop, Nav-Comms. Two VOR heads. ADF, GPS and an auto-pilot.

I wouldn't fly plane A, IFR, into crowded airspace on a GOOD day let alone IMC without a co-pilot to switch frequencies (nav and com).. track a VOR or two and deal with ATC.

Plane B would be rather easy. With 2 VORs tuned in (and two in stand-by), two comms tuned (and two in stand-by).. an NDB (or even a major city radio station) for reference AND a GPS

[chornedsnorkack]

[quote]Work load is relative.. For example, we'll compare two IFR certified Cessna 172s:

Plane A: One Nav radio/single VOR/ILS head. One Communications radio and a transponder.

Plane B: Two, flip-flop, Nav-Comms. Two VOR heads. ADF, GPS and an auto-pilot.

I wouldn't fly plane A, IFR, into crowded airspace on a GOOD day let alone IMC without a co-pilot to switch frequencies (nav and com).. track a VOR or two and deal with ATC.

Plane B would be rather easy. With 2 VORs tuned in (and two in stand-by), two comms tuned (and two in stand-by).. an NDB (or even a major city radio station) for reference AND a GPS

[C]

What are the biggest planes that are deliberately flown by one pilot?

Back to your initial question, the RAF's Canberra is operated by a single pilot, and has been for 50 years, and before that most of the heavy bombers in the RAF during WWII were single pilot, with a flight engineer...

[Brett_Henderson]

Regulations aside.. and just for the sake of this discussion.. I'd say both pilots have similar work loads.

A real jet jockey would have to confirm this of course.

But, like anything else, as you add variables, the complexity grows geometrically. Just the fact that there's more that CAN go wrong on a bigger plane is reason to have a co-pilot.

I think the biggest appeal for smaller jets is that they can fly in/out of major cities using smaller airports. The fact that they'll all be above 18,000msl during the flight makes them all IFR... But you can fly into, say, Columbus, Ohio where you're only real contact with ATC is to get turned over to KOSU's (Ohio State University Airport) tower and be cleared to land. Flying into Port Columbus means getting in line with a dozen other jets following standard terminal arrivals and quite possibly having to fly a hold or two (no fun in bad weather without a co-pilot). Since you cannot land a 777 at KOSU.. well.. you get the idea..

[TSC.]

The Beechcraft Premier IA is the only swept-wing  business jet approved for single-pilot operations (source: Today's Pilot):



Cheers,

TSC.

[Citationpilot]

The largest civilian aircraft you can fly single pilot in the US (by number of seats) would be either the 1900 or the Metroliner (the 1900 is the heaviest). The fastest is currently the Permier, but will soon be the new Sweinger jet.

I've got a little CJ2 time. Although I've never flown a 777 I have ridden jumpseat (pre 9-11) and can guarentee you the 777 pilots have a much, much higher workload, especially once you start the decent.

And for the record I'd have no problem taking "Plane A" into an airport IFR, but I'm old school! Especially in a 172 when you're only doing 100 knots over the ground.

[wealthysoup]

one of the reasons they have 2 pilots is so that if one of them eats something and gets food poisoning etc then the other pilot can still fly and land safely, thus the reason that both pilots arent allowed to eat the same food on board the plane incase theres something wrong with the chicken casserole the pilot had the copilot would still be ok after having lasagne or whatever, so would be able to land it

[TSC.]

Rumack: What was it we had for dinner tonight?
Elaine Dickinson: Well, we had a choice of steak or fish.
Rumack: Yes, yes, I remember, I had lasagna.



TSC.

[Chris_F]

Rumack: What was it we had for dinner tonight?
Elaine Dickinson: Well, we had a choice of steak or fish.
Rumack: Yes, yes, I remember, I had lasagna.



TSC.

Surely you can't be serious!

[TSC.]

Surely you can't be serious!

I am serious & don't call me Shirley............

TSC.