Flight is designed for people who think FSX is too hard-core & difficult.
Flight is designed for people who think FSX is too hard-core & difficult.
MS bargained on the fact that people who have Flight would prefer an easy to use game with ok graphics rather than a sim with great graphics that is very realistic.
Flight is designed for people who think FSX is too hard-core & difficult.
MS bargained on the fact that people who have Flight would prefer an easy to use game with ok graphics rather than a sim with great graphics that is very realistic.
Look at it this way, Microsoft is still printing and selling FSX while putting on the market a flight game aimed at those who, as you put it, prefer a package that is easier to manage and probably friendlier with older PCs. The end result is that most hard core Flight Simmers, like myself, will buy at least one package out of curiosity while a gate is opened to a whole new breed of customers. When one makes a comparison between the two and depending on a person's taste, the probable result will be buying FSX or MF, both being sold by Microsoft. How can they lose? What Microsoft did was to add an alternative product to FSX. Lets face it, what more could they have added to FSX in a FS-11 version that has not already been added by Third Party Software Developers?
"Lets face it, what more could they have added to FSX in a FS-11 version that has not already been added by Third Party Software Developers?"
They could have fixed the terrible autogen and cloud popping + a load of other problems!
I think the suits pushed the product before it was actually completed..
Anyway, this is history now, enjoy what we have.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 177 guests